Ephialtes duplicauda Heinrich 1949
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Ephialtes duplicauda Heinrich, 1949 Ephialtes duplicauda Heinrich 1949: 67 [holotype ♀ (AEIC), Germany, “ Berchtesgaden Hachelgraben 1600 m, 18.6.47”]. Synonym: Pimpla spatulata Townes, 1960 (Horstmann 2008: 153). References. Townes & Townes 1960: 106 [Pimpla spatulata (description); Canada, USA; host]. Frankie & Koehler 1971: 957 [Pimpla spatulata; host; USA (California)]. Carlson 1979: 326 [Pimpla spatulata; catalogue]. Ruíz-Cancino et al. 2002: 645 [Ephialtes spatulatus; Mexico]. Material examined. MEXICO. Tamaulipas: 1 ♀ (UAT) 15 km SSW of Cd. Victoria, El Madroño, 23.iii.1985, coll. J. Ruíz-Cancino. Durango: 1 ♀ (AEIC) 5 km W of El Salto, 8800 ft. (= 2680 m), 12.vii.1972, coll. B. & C. Dasch. 1 ♀ (AEIC) 14 mi W of Ojuelos de Jalisco, 2245 m, 7.vii.1972, coll. B. & C. Dasch. Distribution. Holarctic species. Europe,? India, Canada, USA (west and northeast, south to California), Mexico (Tamaulipas, Durango). Biology. In the Nearctic region, reared from Ptosima gibbicollis (Say) (Buprestidae) in Cersis canadensis L. (Fabaceae), from log of “ Picea canadensis ” infested with Tetropium cinnamopterum Kirby (Coleoptera: Cerambycidae), from prepupa of Rygchium sp. (Hymenoptera: Vespidae), and from unknown hosts in Pinus ponderosa Douglas ex C. Lawson and Pseudotsuga taxifolia Britton (Pinaceae) (Townes & Townes 1960). Townes (Townes & Townes 1960) assumed that listed above records from Coleoptera are probably incorrect because E. duplicauda and related species are known as parasitoids in the cells of bees and wasps nesting in wood, and therefore only parasitism in Rygchium sp. is undoubtful. Also reared from cones infested with Laspeyresia cupressana (Kearfott) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae) in California, USA (Frankie & Koehler 1971).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.012 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".