MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949860487 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.15218405

Empis (Enoplempis) fisheri Sinclair, Brooks & Cumming, 2025, sp. nov.

2025· article· en· W6949860487 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2025
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsCanadian Food Inspection Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHolotypeSetaKeelBalloon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empis (Enoplempis) fisheri sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 66CD1D6E-2EEE-4C88-BCE4-1C34D17BDD0C (Figs 176–178, 183, 184, 192) Type material. HOLOTYPE ♂, labelled: “USA: CA: El Dorado Co. / El Dorado Hills, New York / Creek, 680 ft. 38°41′43″N,/ 121°04′38″W E.M. Fisher / IV.20.2002”; “El Dorado Hills/ IV-20-2002 / ♂ swarm, ea. w/ balloon, w/o prey”; “ HOLOTYPE / Empis (Enoplempis) / fisheri Sinclair,/ Brooks & Cumming [red label]” (CSCA). PARATYPES: USA. California: El Dorado County: Same data as holotype (1♂ with balloon without prey, 2♂, CNC; 2♂ with balloon without prey, 2♂, CSCA); same data as holotype except, 21.vi.2002 (1♂ with balloon without prey, CNC; 1♂, CSCA); El Dorado Hills, New York Ck, 22.iii.1998, in swarm, each with balloon, E.M. Fisher (2♂, CNC; 2♂, 1♂ with balloon without prey, CSCA); El Dorado Hills, N. York Ck, 700 ft, 18–20.iv.2002, male swarm, each w/ white balloon w/o prey (4♂, CNC; 3♂ CSCA); El Dorado Hills, 38°41′43″N 121°04′44″W, 222 m, 24.iii.2003, J. & A. Skevington (1♂, CNC). Placer County: 4 km NE Auburn at American R, 38.9164°N 121.0392°W, 563 ft, 6.vi.2012, G.W. Forister (2♂, 2♀, UCDC). Diagnosis. This species is distinguished from other species of the E. (En.) geneatis species group by the absence of long setae on the face, palpus or antenna (Fig. 177), male hindleg with lobes and modified setae (Fig. 178), hind tibia somewhat clavate with expanded hind tarsomere 1, and the male cercus is narrower than epandrium, projecting horizontally. Description. Wing length 3.3–3.6 mm. Male. Similar to E. (En.) geneatis, except as follows: head with face without setae (Fig. 177). Ocellar triangle elevated, grey pruinescent, with pair of thin ocellar setae, longer than pprn; posterior setulae half length of ocellars. Occiput bearing slightly arched setae on upper half; thinner, wavy setae posterior to mouth opening; bare posterior to ocellar triangle. Scape 2× longer than pedicel, with short setulae, at most subequal to width of scape; pedicel with normal circlet of setulae; postpedicel long and tapered, 5× longer than basal width; stylus 1.5× basal width of postpedicel. Palpus black, with short setae. Thorax dark brown in ground-colour, densely grey pruinescent. Scutum with pair of distinct greyish vittae between acr and dc rows (viewed anteriorly or posteriorly). Proepisternum with short setae on lower section; upper proepisternum in front of spiracle without setae. Postpronotum with 1 long seta and several shorter, silky setae. Scutum with long bi-serial acr, increasing in length posteriorly; dc multi-serial, similar to acr, increasing in length posteriorly; 2 posterior npl, with several shorter anterior npl; 1 presut spal and several long, silky setae; 1 psut spal and several long, silky setae; 1 pal. Scutellum with pair of long sctl, with 2–3 pairs of shorter marginal setae; disc bare. Laterotergite with numerous long, pale setae. Legs short, slender, entirely dark brown (Fig. 176). Coxae with pale setae, shorter than length of coxae. Leg setae mostly pale. Fore femur with fine, erect posterior setae. Fore tibia with fine, erect posterior setae; ventrally with fine, dense setae, length less than half width of segment, continuing on tarsomeres. Fore tarsomere 1 not broader than apex of tibia; all tarsomeres without spine-like ventral setae; tarsomeres 2–3 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, not longer than width of segment. Mid femur with similar setae to fore femur, longer dorsally and anteriorly. Mid tibia with several erect anterodorsal and posterodorsal setae; ventrally with long, dense setae, longer than twice width of tibia. Mid tarsomeres 1–3 with several pairs of strong ventral setae, shorter than width of tarsus; tarsomeres 1–3 with apicolateral pair of spine-like setae, shorter than width of segment. Hind femur slender, clothed in fine ventral setae, shorter than width of femur; longer anterior and dorsal setae on basal half; short anteroventral tubercle with dark, sharp semi-circular ridge; posteroventral tubercle distal to anteroventral tubercle, with radiating row of 5–8 pale setae, longer than length of tubercle (Fig. 178). Hind tibia somewhat clavate, with sub-basal ventral swelling, truncate with ridge of long posteroventral setae; dorsal setae shorter than width of tibia (Fig. 178). Hind tarsomeres distinctly swollen, narrower than apex of tibia, with strong ventral setae; tarsomeres 2–5 similar to mid tarsus. Wing clear with dark veins; veins mostly well sclerotized, CuA+CuP very weak, not reaching wing margin. Abdomen dark brown, thinly pruinescent to shiny, with long, pale wavy setae on tergites and sternites of segments 1 and 2. Terminalia (Figs 183, 184): dark brown. Cercus narrower than epandrium, subtriangular, tapering posteriorly to rounded apex; fused anterolaterally with epandrium; dorsal margin straight; length of setae about same as width of cercus. Subepandrial process extended to phallus; apex arched ventrally. Epandrial lamella subtriangular, posterior margin projecting beyond cercus, bearing apical setae, slightly longer than cercal setae; apex broadly rounded, not upturned. Hypandrium longer and wide along posterior margin; apex tapered, less than half as long as epandrium; several short setae present. Phallus (Fig. 184) with base not greatly expanded, with pair of slender processes beyond mid-length; apical section abruptly curved beyond epandrium, with numerous lateral setulae; apex of wide dorsal opening; ejaculatory apodeme short, less than half-length of epandrium, with narrow horizontal wings ventrally. Female. Similar to male, except as follows: frons as broad as antennal sockets, with short setulae along eye margin; legs similar to male, without tubercles on hindleg; cercus long and slender, subequal to length of tergite 8. Geographical distribution and seasonal occurrence (Fig. 192). Empis (En.) fisheri is known from March to June in El Dorado and Placer Counties in California. Etymology. This species is named in honour of the collector of most of the type series, Eric M. Fisher, formerly of the California State Collection of Arthropods (CSCA). Nuptial gift presentation. Males have been observed in swarms each carrying a relatively small white balloon, without prey (see “ Type material” above). The balloons appear to collapse after collection. Remarks. This species has been collected in March and April, together with swarms of E. (En.) bigoti. Empis (En.) fisheri is tentatively assigned to the E. (En.) geneatis group, on the basis of similarly long acrostichal and dorsocentral setae, holoptic male with upper facets enlarged, and shape of hind tibia and tarsomeres. This species differs from the other two species of this group by the absence of long setae on the head and modified male hindleg.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.175

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.169 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2025
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy→French-language works237,207→