MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6949871039 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5030741

Polypedilum (Uresipedilum) excelsius Townes

2010· article· en· W6949871039 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCraniofacial Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaScutellumWingThorax (insect anatomy)Apex (geometry)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Polypedilum (Uresipedilum) excelsius Townes stat. n. Figs 26–31 Polypedilum pedatum excelsius Townes, 1945: 55. Material examined. CANADA: British Columbia, Marion Lake at dock and on west shore, 2 males, 7 & 25.v.1965, A.L. Hamilton (ZMBN). Diagnostic characters. The males apparently differ from P. p e d a t u m by having R4+5 reaching apex of wing, projection of superior volsella clearly longer than base, third palpomere with 2–3 lanceolate sensilla clavata, squama with about 16 setae and M without setae. Male (n = 2, except when otherwise stated). Total length 4.39–4.75 mm. Wing length 2.70–3.01 mm. Total length / wing length 1.58–1.63. Wing length / length of profemur 2.47–2.51. Coloration. Thorax brown with darker vittae, postnotum, preepisternum and much of anepisternum; scutellum pale. Legs beyond coxae pale brown. Abdomen brown, gonocoxite and gonostylus pale. Head. AR 1.04–1.12. Ultimate flagellomere 633–671 μm long. Temporal setae 12–16 including 3–4 inner verticals, 3–5 outer verticals and 6–7 postorbitals. Clypeus with 25–26 setae. Tentorium 128–150 μm long, 56–68 μm wide at sieve pore. Stipes 150–165 μm long, 45 μm wide. Palpomere lengths (in μm): 41–45, 56– 68, 221–244, 135–165, 229–263. Third palpomere with 2–3 lanceolate sensilla clavata, longest 23 μm long. Thorax (Fig. 27). Acrostichals 20 (1); dorsocentrals 17–23, including 2 scutal fossal setae in one specimen; prealars 7–8. Scutellum with 22–24 setae. Wing (Fig. 28). VR 1.15–1.29. R2+3 well separated from R1. R4+5 strongly curved at apex, ending at wing tip. Brachiolum with 2 setae, R with 28–31, R1 with 28–35, R4+5 with 46–55 setae, M bare. Squama with 16 setae. Legs. Scale on fore tibia (Fig. 26) 38–45 μm long, rounded, without spur. Spur of mid tibia 60–64 μm long including comb, unspurred comb 26 μm long. Spur on hind tibia 64–71 μm long including comb, unspurred comb 30–34 μm long. Width at apex of fore tibia 38–45 μm, of mid tibia 64–68 μm, of hind tibia 71–74 μm. Length and proportions of legs as in Table 3. fe ti ta1 ta2 ta3 ta4 p1 1096–1200 945–1096 1106–1171 728–794 614–680 473–491 p2 1229–1436 1087–1200 567–614 378–416 302–321 170 p3 1370–1531 1276–1436 879–983 529–586 482–510 279–284 ta5 LR BV SV BR p1 189–194 1.07–1.17 1.57–1.61 1.84–1.96 3.6–4.0 p2 95 0.51–0.52 3.05–3.25 4.08–4.29 4.4–6.7 p3 113–132 0.68–0.69 2.52–2.61 3.01–3.02 4.0–6.3 Hypopygium (Figs 29–30). Tergite IX with 10–13 strong median setae and altogether 8–10 setae to each side of base of anal point. Anal point 79–90 μm long, parallel-sided. Transverse sternapodeme 68 μm long, phallapodeme 116 μm long. Gonocoxite 184–214 μm long. Gonostylus 165–191 μm long, with 1 apical seta and 4–6 long setae along inner margin. Base of superior volsella (Fig. 31) sparsely covered with microtrichia, 45–49 μm long; with 75–86 μm long apicolateral seta and and row of 6 baso-ventral, inner setae; apical projection 56–60 μm long, upturned at apex. Inferior volsella 135–143 μm long, tapering, with 14–15 setae. HR 1.11–1.12. HV 2.49–2.66. Remarks. Maschwitz and Cook (2000: 106) synonymized the two subspecies of P. pedatum since they found intermediates in the extent of the downturned curvature of the apical part of wing vein R4+5. In our specimens R4+5 reaches the wing tip in P. excelsius, but ends distinctly before the wing tip in P. pedatum. The projection of the superior volsella is distinctly longer than the base in P. excelsius, at most as long as base in P. pedatum. We found several other differences in measurements making us believe that the two subspecies should be regarded as separate species rather than be synonymized. However, the differences in the number of setae on squama, the number of sensilla clavata on third palpomere, presence or absence of setae on vein M and the other differences in measurements found may not hold up when associated material can be examined.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.031

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicCraniofacial Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207