Personnes et libertés dans une société en mal de « sécurité »
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ce chapitre se propose de restituer une réflexion sur la dialectique entre personnes et libertés, à la lumière de quelques tendances lourdes qui, à compter du tournant du XXIème siècle, connotent fortement le traitement de la criminalité dans nos sociétés occidentales. Ces tendances donnent à lire la sécurité, désormais élargie à une absence de menaces à l’encontre des personnes et leurs biens, sous l’angle d’une société du risque, de l’insécurité et de la surveillance qui convergent vers l’émergence d’une société de l’exclusion et qui placent les personnes et leurs libertés sous tensions. <strong>Abstract :</strong> This chapter provides a reflection on the dialectic between peoples and freedoms in the light of some of the major trends dealing with crime and its control since the beginning of the XXI century in western societies. These trends reveal major issues regarding security – understood as a lack of threats to individuals and their goods – under a notion of risk, uncertainty and surveillance, which converge towards a society that ends up with people being put aside and their liberties being jeopardised.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it