MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949908737 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3846079

Spilogona contractifrons

2018· article· en· W6949908737 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMalaiseCaveMountain range (options)Goose

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spilogona contractifrons (Zetterstedt, 1838) Fig. 1A, D, G, J Type locality SWEDEN: “Lapland”. Material examined CANADA: 1 ♁, Manitoba, Goose Creek Rd., Pump House, 58°38′ N, 94°14′ W, Malaise trap, 17–21 Jul. 2007, A. Renaud leg. (SZMN); 1 ♁, Manitoba, 4 km S of Churchill, Beach Bay, 58°45′ N, 94°08′ W, sweep in vegetation, 24 Jul. 2007, A. Renaud leg. (SZMN); 1 ♀, Manitoba, Churchill, 12 km E on Launch road, 58°45′ N, 93°59′ W, Malaise trap, 3–7 Jul. 2007, A. Renaud leg. (SZMN); 1 ♀, Manitoba, 24 km E of Churchill, Ramsay Creek, 58°44′ N, 93°47′ W, Malaise trap, 25–29 Jul. 2007, A. Renaud leg. (SZMN). RUSSIA: 1 ♁, Altai Republic, Kosh-Agach district, Ukok plateau, environs of Kal’dzhin-Kul’-Bas lake, 49°19′ N, 87°26′ E, 2450 m a.s.l., 21 Jul. 2006, V. Sorokina leg. (SZMN); 2 ♁♁, Altai Republic, Kosh- Agach district, Rodonovyi spring, upper part of Zhumaly river, 49°27′ N, 88°03′ E, 2410 m a.s.l., 4 Jul. 2005, 23–24 Jul. 2006, T. Novgorodova and V. Sorokina leg. (SZMN); 1 ♁, Altai Republic, Kosh- Agach district, Severo-Chuyskyi Ridge, valley of Aktru River, 50°06′ N, 87°48′ E, 2064 m a.s.l., 21 Jul. 2013, V. Sorokina leg. (SZMN); 2 ♀♀, “Chita region” [Zabaykalsky Krai], 6 km N, of Teli Mountain, Toreyskie lakes, 50º06′ N, 115º41′ E, steppe, 6 Jul. 2011, V. Dubatolov leg. (SZMN); 1 ♁, Kurgan region, environs of Kurgan, 55°30′ N, 66°19′ Е, sweep in grass meadow, 17 Jun. 2015, V. Sorokina leg. (SZMN); 1 ♁, Magadan region, Ust’-Omchug, 61°08′ N, 149°39′ Е, 1 Jul. 1971, Gorodkov leg. (ZISP); 1 ♀ 1 ♁, Magadan region, 20 km S of Gizhiga village, “Chaibukha aerodrome” [~ 61°50′ N, 160°32′ Е], valley of Chaibukha River, 7 km from mouth of river, 2 Sep. 1987, Gorodkov leg. (ZISP); 1 ♀, Magadan region, Aborigen field station, 61°20′ N, 149°23′ Е, 500 m a.s.l., 5–10 Aug.1990, M. Wood leg. (SZMN); 10 ♁♁ 3 ♀♀, Magadan region, environs of Sokol village, 59°54′ N, 150°45′ E, 11–19 Jul. 2014, N. Vikhrev leg. (1 ♀ 1 ♁ in SZMN, rest in ZMUM); 1 ♁, Magadan region, 92 km NE of Magadan, valley of Donyshko river, 60°20′ N, 151°23′ Е, 570 m a.s.l., 17 Jul. 2014, N. Vikhrev leg. (ZMUM); 1 ♁, Magadan region, Koni Peninsula, environs of Cape Ploskyi cordon, valley of Khindzha river, 59°09′ N, 151°38′ Е, 29 Jun. 2016, N. Tridrikh leg. (SZMN); 2 ♀♀, same data as for preceding except: birch copse on the slope, 22 Aug. 2017; 1 ♀, Magadan region, Koni Peninsula, Cape Skalistyi, valley of Skalistaya river, 59°07′ N, 151°23′ Е, yellow plate traps, 23 Aug. 2017, N. Tridrikh leg. (SZMN); 1 ♁ 2 ♀♀, Nenets AO, Khaypudyrskaya Bay, “Chuba”, 68°16′ N, 59°57′ Е, yellow plate trap, meadow, 6–16 Aug. 2015, O. Makarova and Bizin leg. (SZMN); 2 ♁♁ 2 ♀, Nenets AO, Pakhancheskaya Bay, 68°29′ N, 57°26′ Е, yellow plate trap, tundra, 26 Jul.–5 Aug. 2015, O. Makarova and Bizin leg. (SZMN); 1 ♁ 1 ♀, Nenets AO, Bolvanskaya Bay, 68°05′ N, 54°47′ Е, yellow plate trap, anthropogenic meadow, 18–25 Jul. 2015, O. Makarova and Bizin leg. (SZMN); 1 ♁ 4 ♀♀, Novosibirsk region, Zdvinsk district, environs of Shirokaya Kurya village [54°34′ N, 78°08′ Е], field station, 8 Jul. 2002, Zavarukhina leg. (SZMN). SWEDEN: 1 ♁ 1 ♀, “Vällistefjäll” [Jämtland, Välliste Mountain, 63°16′ N, 13°07′ E, 700–800 m a.s.l.], forest zone, 23 Jul. 1980, A. Pont leg. (SZMN). Distribution Holarctic Region; in the Palaearctic, from Northern Europe to the Russian Far East. Arcto-borealmountain species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→