MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949925923 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4763849

Hesperoperla pacifica

2011· article· en· W6949925923 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicFish Ecology and Management Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBattleFork (system call)Spring (device)TroutHolotypeWillow

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Hesperoperla pacifica (Banks) (Figs. 21-30) Acroneuria pacifica Banks, 1900:242. Holotype ♀ (Museum of Comparative Zoology), Olympia [Thurston Co.], Washington Material examined. Alberta: Battle Creek at Reservoir Lake, 23 June 1975, L. Dosdall, 1♀ (BPS). California: Humboldt Co., East Fork Willow Creek, Hwy 299, 24 April 1987, B. Stark, R.W. Baumann, C. R. Nelson, 2♀ (BPS). Shasta Co., North Fork Battle Creek, south of Shingletown, 8 June 2004, B. Stark, R.W. Baumann, 1♀ (BPS). Tehama Co., North Fork Battle Creek, Wildcat Road, 26 April 1987, B. Stark, R.W. Baumann, C. R. Nelson, 2♀ (BPS). Colorado: Gunnison Co., Gunnison River, Hwy 135, 8 June 2003, B. Stark, 3♂, 2♀ (BPS). Idaho: Bonneville Co., Snake River, 4 July 1972, G. Tourtlotte, 1♂, 1♀ (BPS). Fremont Co., Big Springs, 5 miles east Macks Inn, 25 July 1979, B. Stark, K.W. Stewart, R.W. Baumann, 4♀ (BPS). Montana: Carbon Co., East Rosebud River, Roscoe, 23 July 1989, B. Stark, 5♂, 3♀ (BPS). Lewis & Clark Co., Trout Creek, Vigilante Campground, 21 August 2004, B. Stark, I. Sivec, 1♂, 1♀ (BPS). New Mexico: San Miguel Co., Pecos River, 6 miles north Pecos, 12 July 1973, B. Stark, 2♂, 3♀ (BPS). Nevada: Elko Co., Secret Creek, Secret Pass, 15 June 1974, B. Stark, 1♂, 1♀ (BPS). Oregon: Jefferson Co., Metolius River at headwater spring source, 11 July 1979, B. Stark, K.W. Stewart, 5♂, 3♀ (BPS). Tillamook Co., Nehalem River at Cronin Creek jct., 4 June 1991, B. Stark, R.W. Baumann, C. Henderson, 1♀ (BPS). Wyoming: Park Co., Clarks Fork Yellowstone River, below Cooke City, 20 July 1989, B. Stark, 3♂, 1♀ (BPS). Egg. Outline oval with short, wide collar (Fig. 21); collar base encircled by a prominent basal ring, ca. 137-176 μm wide (Figs. 23, 25, 27, 29); sides of egg body along basal ring bearing a series of vertical ridges separated by wide depressions. Egg length ca. 428-484 μm, equatorial width ca. 312-324 μm, collar length ca. 34-55 μm, median collar width ca. 41-58 μm, rim width ca. 89-116 μm. Sides of collar with several prominent vertical ridges, rim flanged and irregularly incised. Chorionic surface appearing smooth (Figs. 21, 26, 28, 30) but with obscure hexagonal follicle cell impressions sometimes apparent at higher magnifications. Micropyles located near equator; orifices raised slightly (Fig. 24). Comments. Hesperoperla eggs are generally similar to those of Calineuria californica in shape, collar form and in having a basal ridge encircling the collar base (Baumann & Stark 1980; Isobe 1997). The most conspicuous feature distinguishing the eggs of the two genera is the row of vertical struts on the egg body which connect to the basal ridge in Hesperoperla (Fig. 25) which are absent in eggs of Calineuria (Fig. 2). No consistent morphological differences were found among eggs of different populations of H. pacifica, or between eggs of H. hoguei and H. pacifica. However, variations are evident in the images of H. pacifica eggs from different sites (Figs. 21-30), especially in shape of the anterior pole (e.g. Figs. 26, 28), shape of the collar (e.g. Figs. 25, 27) and in length of lines delimiting cells surrounding the basal ridge (= vertical struts). The specimen shown from the Gunnison River, Colorado, for example, has a few long lines of at least 57 μm (Fig. 25), whereas the longest vertical struts on the specimen shown from Trout Creek, Montana (Fig. 27) are only 30 μm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.088

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicFish Ecology and Management Studies→French-language works237,207→