Bibliographic record
Abstract
CAMPTOPTEROIDES Viggiani, 1974 (Figs 62–67) Camptopteroides Viggiani, 1974: 3. Type species: Camptopteroides armata Viggiani, 1974, by original designation. See Huber et al. (2020) for generic synonyms and their type species. Diagnosis. Funicle 7-segmented with fu 2 ring-like, much shorter than fu 1 or fu 3 and sometimes almost fused to fu 3 (Fig.63); clava as long as scape, longer than funicle + pedicel; mandible with 2 teeth (Fig. 62a); head posteriorly with median vertical coronal sulcus extending from vertexal suture to meet transoccipital sulcus and transoccipital sulcus short, extending from dorsal to foramen laterally towards ventral margin of eye (Fig. 62b); head and, especially, frenum, metanotum and propodeum with distinct reticulate sculpture (Figs 62, 65, 66); fore wing usually with transverse brown bands separated subapically by a small hyaline area (Fig. 64); petiole ring-like, much shorter than wide (Fig. 65), barely or not visible in lateral view (Figs 66, 67). Remarks. Camptopteroides belongs to the Camptoptera group of genera. It is the only genus in the group with distinctly patterned wings and includes the largest species among any in the Camptoptera group of genera. Neotropical hosts. Unknown. Distribution. No named species in the Neotropical region. Luft Albarracin et al. (2014) recorded the genus from Argentina. Specimens examined are from about 10 other countries in Central and South America and the Caribbean islands (CNC, UCRC). Important reference. Huber & Lin (1999).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".