MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6949929695 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4340467

Trichocoelina tecta Vilkamaa & Menzel 2019, sp. n.

2019· article· en· W6949929695 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicLichen and fungal ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaDorsumHolotypeAntenna (radio)Scutellum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Trichocoelina tecta sp. n. Figs 15 B, 16 D Material studied. Holotype male. USA, Alaska, 11 mi S Anderson Jct, Rte 3, mi 270, alder-poplar-spruce, Malaise trap, 23.VI–11.VIII.1984, S. & J. Peck (in MZH). Paratypes. USA, same data as holotype, 1 male (MZH); CANADA, Nunavut, Qikitaaluk, Western Bylot Island, 73.157°N, 79.950°W, 12 m, 3.VIII.2007, L. Jolicoeur & L. McKinnon, 1 male (BOLD Sample ID 08WOLVES-01202, in CBG); Yukon, North Fork Crossing, Mi 42 Peel Plt. Road, 3500’, 24.VI.1962, P.J. Skitsko, 1 male (in CNC); RUSSIA, Krasnoyarsk region, Taimyr Peninsula, river Zakharova, Rassokha, 72.70°N, 101.08°E, pan trap, 1–10.VII.2011, A. Barkalov, 1 male (in ISEA); Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Okrug, near Seyakh, 70.7788°N, 72.0750°E, nival meadow, Malaise trap, 13–29.VII.2014, N. Zubryi, 5 males (1 in MZH, 1 in NHMO, 2 in SDEI, 1 in ZIN). Description. Male. Head. Face and antenna concolorous brown, maxillary palpus pale yellowish. Eye bridge 2–3 facets wide. Face with 13–20 fine setae. Clypeus with 2–5 setae. Maxillary palpus with 3 segments, 1 st segment longer or shorter than 3 rd segment, 2 nd segment shortest; 1 st segment with 1–2 setae, with a dorsal patch of sensilla; surface of antennal flagellomeres smooth, body of 4 th antennal flagellomere 1.7–2.25x as long as wide, the neck shorter than broad, the longest setae slightly shorter than the width of flagellomere. Thorax. Brown, setae pale. Anterior pronotum with 2–6 setae. Proepisternum with 3–10 setae. Scutellum with 4 longer and some short and fine setae. Wing. Fumose. Length 1.9–2.1 mm. Width/length 0.40–0.45. Anal lobe weak. Veins distinct. c/w 0.60–0.65. R 1 /R 0.60–0.85. stM and fork of M subequal in length. r-m and bM of variable length, bM non-setose, r-m with 2–4 setae or non-setose. Halter yellow. Legs. Yellow, coxal setae pale. Fore tibial organ forming a small patch of dark strong setae in depression. Fore tibial spur slightly longer than the tibial width. Abdomen. Pale brown, setae pale, moderately long. Hypopygium (Fig. 15 B). Brown, as abdomen. Intergonocoxal area long, basally with strongly sclerotized medial stripe, with large subtriangular lobe with setae at margin. Gonocoxa broad, longer than gonostylus, medial margin basally strongly curved, with long sparse setosity. Gonostylus (Fig. 16 D) long, apically narrowed, strongly impressed; with short setosity, with a long apical tooth, with 6–7 medial megasetae in dorsal and ventral groups, megasetae long and slender, directed slightly differently in both groups; with 1 well-differentiated whiplash seta on ventromedial margin. Tegmen conical, apically and laterally straight or slightly curved, weakly sclerotized, with an indistinct area of minute aedeagal teeth. Aedeagal apodeme long. BIN. BOLD:AAM9263. Discussion. In having a long intergonocoxal lobe of hypopygium and 6–7 medial megasetae on the gonostylus, Trichocoelina tecta sp. n. resembles T. vitticollis (Rübsaamen) but differs in the intergonocoxal lobe being setose only on its margins, not on its ventral side, in its conical tegmen, not apically roundish, and in having the gonostylar megasetae in groups pointed at two directions, not all in a row pointing in one direction. Etymology. The name is Latin, tecta, covered, referring to the ventromedial part of the gonostylus covering almost completely the medial megasetae.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0210.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicLichen and fungal ecology→French-language works237,207→