Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bougisia ornata Laval Bougisia ornata Laval, 1966: 210–216, figs 1–4. – VicencioAguilar & FernándezAlamo 1995: 22 (list). Zeidler 1998: 43, figs 28 & 29. Type material The holotype male is in the MOM (No. 5296). The allotype female and a paratype male are in the collections of the Zoological Station, VillefranchesurMer, France. The type locality is the Mediterranean Sea, near VillefranchesurMer, France. Material examined (10 specimens) North Atlantic: 1 lot (USNM), 1 lot (ZMB), 9 specimens. Tasman Sea: 1 lot (SAMA), 1 specimen. Diagnosis Head slightly shorter than pereonites 1 & 2. Gnathopod 2 with carpal process extending to about middle of propodus (or slightly less). Pereopod 5 with long setae on anterior margin of basis to propodus. Pereopods 6 & 7 with relatively smooth margins. Remarks This is a very rare and distinctive species. Laval (1966) provides some biological information, and records it as an associate of Phialidium sp. (Leptomedusae). Distribution This species has only been recorded from the Mediterranean Sea (near VillefranchesurMer, France), the eastern tropical Pacific Ocean (off Costa Rica) and the Tasman Sea (off Jervis Bay, New South Wales). There are also specimens in the USNM and ZMB from off northwest Africa (24ºN, 17ºW).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.079 | 0.027 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".