Deltochilum (Calhyboma) carinatum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deltochilum (Calhyboma) carinatum (Westwood, 1837) Hyboma carinata Westwood 1837: 256 (South America) Distribution. Guyana: Paulian 1939: 11 (as D. (Eudactylides) carinatum); Bicknell et al. 2014: table S1. Suriname: Paulian 1939: 11 (as D. (Eudactylides) carinatum); Pereira and Andretta 1955: 22; Larsen 2011: 98, 2013: 96; MHCN; NZCS; RMNH. French Guiana: Paulian 1939: 11 (as D. (Eudactylides) carinatum); Pereira and Andretta 1955: 22; Feer 2000: 32; Feer and Pincebourde 2005: 30; Brûlé et al. 2011a: 193, 2014: 183; Brûlé and Dalens 2012a annex 4: 18; Price and Feer 2012: 327; Boilly 2015b: 88. “Guianas”: Vulcano and Pereira 1964: 643; González et al. 2009: 263. Brazil (NA): Gillet 1911b: 35; Paulian 1939: 11 (as D. (Eudactylides) carinatum); Blackwelder 1944: 202; Pereira and Andretta 1955: 22 (NA); Vulcano and Pereira 1964: 643; Vaz-de-Mello 2000: 192; Quintero and Roslin 2005: appendix A (NA); Gardner et al. 2008: table S1 (D. carinatus) (NA); González et al. 2009: 263; Ratcliffe 2013b: 493 (NA); Boilly 2015b: 88 (NA). Venezuela (EO): Pereira and Andretta 1955: 22 (EO); Vulcano and Pereira 1964: 643; González et al. 2009: 263. Other: Westwood 1837: 256 (South America - as Hyboma carinata); Vulcano and Pereira 1964: 643 (Peru); Medina et al. 2001: 136 (Colombia); González et al. 2009: 263 (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru); Boilly 2015b: 88 (Colombia, Ecuador, Peru).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.150 | 0.078 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".