Bibliographic record
Abstract
Key to the species of Stipulosina 1) Eye height less than 3× genal height (Fig. 15c). Hind tibia with some enlarged dorsal setae on distal half; hind femur similar in color to hind tibia and weakly swollen, about twice the diameter of the tibia (Fig. 15a). Surstylus with a single long curved lobe with three stout preapical setae (Fig. 16a)................ Stipulosina curvistylus new species, known only from one male. - Eye height greater than 4× genal height (Figs. 6c, 9c, 12c). Hind tibia with only uniformly small dorsal setae; hind femur darker than hind tibia and conspicuously swollen, at least 3× the diameter of the hind tibia (Figs. 6a, 9a, 12a). Surstylus either broad and densely setose (Figs. 7a, 10a) or slender and deeply bifid (Fig. 13a), never curved with stout preapical setae.......... 2 2) Proximal posterodorsal mid tibial seta small, 0.6× the length of anterodorsal seta at same level (Fig. 12e). Cercus reduced to posteroventral corner of epandrium but with conspicuously thick setae (Figs 13a, c). Subepandrial plate broad, triangular or T-shaped (Fig. 13c). Surstylus deeply cleft, U-shaped (Fig. 13d), with two long, narrow, sparsely setose ventral lobes............................................................................. Stipulosina ceroptistylus new species. - Proximal posterodorsal mid tibial seta large, 0.75× the length of anterodorsal seta at same level (Figs. 6e, 9e). Cercus separate, elongate and setose (Figs. 7c, 10d). Subepandrial plate somewhat X-shaped (Figs. 7c, 10d). Surstylus bilobed but not deeply cleft, but, densely setose at apices (Figs. 7a, b, 10a, b)........................................................ 3 3) Male cercus longer than surstylus, setae at apex of cercus much longer than surstylar setae (Fig. 7a). Lateral margins of female T8 dilated, conspicuously longer than dorsal part of sclerite (Fig. 9c)............... Stipulosina amphibarba new species. - Male surstylus longer than cercus, setae on ventral margin of surstylus longer than setae on cercus (Figs. 10a, e). Lateral margins of female T8 only slightly dilated, not conspicuously longer than dorsal part of sclerite (Fig. 11c)...................................................................................... Stipulosina barbistylus new species.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.029 | 0.015 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".