Bibliographic record
Abstract
13. Archiboreoiulus pallidus (Brade-Birks, 1920) Proteroiulus pallidus Brade-Birks, 1920. Boreoiulus pallidus auct. Distribution BE, CH, DE, DK-DEN, ES-SPA, FI, FR-FRA, GB-CI, GB-GRB, GB-NI, HU, IE, LU, NL, NO-NOR, PL, RO, RU-KDG, RU-RUC, RU-RUW, SE, SK, UA. Central, N & E Europe. –Also found in Stavropol, northern Caucasus, Russia (Zuev 2014) and introduced into Canada and USA. Habitat Endogean and troglophile, it has been found mainly in the soil, especially in loamy calcareous and other base-rich types. It is also synanthropic, especially in northern and eastern regions, found in forests, cultivated fields, grassland, gardens, garden waste, spoil heaps, etc. Remarks It is often associated with Blaniulus guttulatus and is similarly regarded as an agricultural pest in several root crops (Pierrard & Biernaux 1974). Its vertical migrations in the soil were described by Biernaux & Baurant (1964). Some parthenogenetic populations exist in the northern part of its European range, as well as in Canada. Prisnyi (2001) stated that all Russian populations appear to be male-free and largely anthropochoric. Regarded as highly endangered in Germany (Voigtländer et al. 2011).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".