Bibliographic record
Abstract
Eucalathis magna Cooper, 1981 (Fig. 10 A-D) Eucalathis magna Cooper, 1981a: 17, pl. 1, figs 1-6. — Zezina 2010: 1187. MATERIAL EXAMINED. — South Madagascar. ATIMO VATAE, stn DW 3529, 1 bivalved specimen. DEPTH RANGE. — 402- 207 m. MEASUREMENTS. — Length 13.4 mm, width 10.7 mm, thickness 4.8 mm. REMARKS Species of the genus Eucalathis are common in all the oceans of the world and range greatly in depth. Six species have been recorded from the Indian Ocean: E. rotundata Cooper, 1981; costellata Cooper, 1981; fasciculata Cooper, 1973; magna Cooper, 1981; murrayi (Davidson, 1878); and rugosa Cooper, 1973 (Logan 2007). E. magna is very rare in the investigated material, represented by only one specimen. It was originally described, also based on one specimen, from the West of Heard Island at a depth of 790 m by Cooper (1981a). The present finding extends its geographical range. This species is characterized by a large size for the genus and almond-like outline. Both in outline and ornamentation E. magna strongly resembles Terebratulina species. Cooper (1981a: 17) indicated the absence of deltidial plates, however, although minute they are present, both in the specimen from off South of Madagascar and the holotype.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".