Exochus mitratus Gravenhorst 1829
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Exochus mitratus Gravenhorst, 1829 (Figures 4l, 7l) Exochus mitratus Gravenhorst, 1829: 350. Exochus a ffi nis Holmgren 1858: 305 – 394. Exochus australis Thomson 1894: 2137. Lectotype: female; Type depository: ZIN. Exochus pseuda ffi nis Strobl 1903: 3 – 100. Type: male. Exochus paradoxus Schmiedeknecht 1924: 103 – 112. Exochus punctifer Schmiedeknecht 1924: 103 – 112. Type: female. Specimens examined (South Korea) 1 male, GB Gyongsan-si, Yeungnam Univ., 4 May 1988, J.H. Kwon; 1 male, ditto, 29 April 1989, K.J. Hwang. Diagnosis Male. Body length 8.5 mm. Antenna with 29 flagellomeres. Head broad and convex, upper face with long projection and very strongly recurved (Figure 4l); between antennal sockets without vertical ridge; dorsal margin of eyes with round small spots. Malar space black. Pronotum sunken. Scutellum and postscutellum black. Propodeum with area superomedia incomplete (Figure 7l); area externa and area dentipara with moderate hairs; spiracle of propodeum oval; metapleuron glabrous except lower area. Vein cu-a of hindwing intercepted at lower 0.25, with vein Cu1. Tergite 1 with short dorsal longitudinal carina, reach central area of tergite 1, up-curved in basal area; between dorsal longitudinal carinae without hair. Tergite 3 with epipleuron semicircular. Distribution South Korea (new record), Austria, Azerbaijan, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Canary Islands, China, Czech Republic, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Hungary, Iran, Ireland, Italy, Japan, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lithuania, Malta, Moldova, Mongolia, the Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Russia, Spain, Sweden, Tunisia, Turkey, USA, Ukraine, United Kingdom, Yugoslavia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.015 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".