MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950012805 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.4270548

Can I Share My Data?

2020· article· en· W6950012805 on OpenAlexaffabout

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicData Analysis and Archiving
Canadian institutionsPortage CollegeWestern UniversityUniversity of GuelphUniversity of British ColumbiaYork UniversityUniversity of WaterlooCarleton UniversityUniversity of WindsorCouncil of Prairie and Pacific University LibrariesUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsData collectionConfidentialityResearch ethicsInformed consentPublic policyInformation system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

"Can I Share My Data?" is designed to be a quick and easy-to-use decision tree to alert Canadian researchers to situations where research data derived from human participants either may not be shared publicly or may require some modification before sharing. It relies heavily on the Canadian Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans - TCPS 2 (2018) which addresses consent and secondary use of information for research purposes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.082
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.238
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesOpen science
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.996
Threshold uncertainty score0.433

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0820.238
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0060.007
Scholarly communication0.0100.018
Open science0.0040.015
Research integrity0.0050.008
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1120.071

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.113
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicData Analysis and ArchivingFrench-language works237,207