Stephanocampta huberi Manickavasagam & Palanivel, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stephanocampta huberi Manickavasagam & Palanivel, sp. nov. (Figs 9–14) Description. Female (holotype). Body length 350. Body dark brown except eye silvery white, scape and legs yellow, and pedicel light brown; wings hyaline. Head (Fig. 9) 0.8× as wide as mesosoma, with vertex transversely striate. Scape (Fig. 10 a, b) 1.5× as long as pedicel; F1 1.75× as long as F2; F3 2.6× as long as wide; F4 and F5 subequal; F5 and F6 equal, F6 and F7 subequal; clava 1.8× as long as combined length of F5–F7, with 4 mps. Mesosoma (Fig. 13) as long as gaster (Fig. 14), mesoscutum about 0.3× as long as wide, with convex, transversely striate sculpture, more arched medially, and with setae on midlobe short; axillar seta long; scutellum 0.6× as long as wide, with lateral longitudinal striations along length, medially the striations converge to meet. Fore wing (Fig. 11) 9.2× as long as wide; disc with 5 dorsal and 3 ventral rows of setae in apical half; longest marginal seta 3.8× maximum wing width. Hind wing (Fig. 12) 24.5× as long as wide; disc with 1 row of dorsal setae, longest marginal seta 9.0× maximum wing width. Metasoma. Petiole 0.42× as long as metacoxa and without a lateral spine (Fig. 14). Gaster slightly longer than wide (140:130); ovipositor exserted (Fig. 14), 1.26× gaster length and 1.36× length of metatibia. Measurements of holotype (as length:width or length). Head, 125:142.5. Antenna: radicle, 10:10; scape, 45:17.5; pedicel, 30:22.5; F1, 17.5:7.5; F2, 10:7.5; F3, 20:7.5; F4, 25:7.5; F5, 22.5:10; F6, 22.5:10; F7, 2.5:12.5; clava, 122.5:20. Mesosoma, 140:130; mesoscutum, 35:120; scutellum, 57.5:90; gaster, 140:130. Fore wing, 415:45, longest marginal seta, 175; hind wing, 367.5:15, longest marginal seta, 135. Petiole, 22.5:20; ovipositor, 177.5:13.25; metacoxa, 53; metatibia, 130. Male. Unknown. Material examined. Holotype: EDAU / Mym12/2015, 1 female dissected and mounted on two slides (one slide containing only one antenna and the other containing the other antenna, and the rest under four cover slips), INDIA: Manipur, Tamenglong, 27.ix.2014, YPTs, forest ecosystem, 24o59’16.5624”N 93o29’43.0512’’E, K. Sophis Singh. Distribution. India: Manipur. Etymology. The species is named after the mymarid specialist, Dr. John T. Huber of the Canadian National Collections of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodes, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada (CNC).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.057 | 0.047 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".