MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950020395 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.3866729

Megaphyllum unilineatum

2017· article· en· W6950020395 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsBC Research (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHabitatFaunaPopulationRobiniaDistribution (mathematics)Taxon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

411. Megaphyllum unilineatum (C.L. Koch, 1838) Julus unilineatus C.L. Koch, 1838. Chromatoiulus unilineatus auct. Julus gilvolineatus L. Koch, 1881. Julus balearicus L. Koch, 1881. Brachyiulus genuinus Verhoeff, 1907. Distribution AL, AT, BA, BG, CZ, DE, ES-BAL, GR-GRC, HR, HU, IT-ITA, MK, MN, PL, RO, SB, SI, SK. Balkan, extending into Central Europe. Habitat Generally in dry habitats such as grasslands on karst, the Pannonian Plain, and disturbed areas. Under stones, along roadsides, in ruins, quarries, urban habitats, caves. Coniferous forests, e.g., Pinus, Picea; Robinia and Quercus woodland. Under Salix leaves by a stream. Regarded as a stenotopic xerobiont open land species with preference for xeric/mesoxeric meadows, fields and fallows in Saxony-Anhalt, Germany (Voigtländer 2011). Mass swarmings have been reported by, e.g., Paszlawsky (1878), Ćurčić & Makarov (1995, lasting nearly four weeks) and Korsós (1998). Remarks The species has not been recorded from the Balearic Islands since Koch (1881), possibly based on a now extinct population (see Enghoff & Vicente 2000). In his fauna of Moldavia, Jawłowski (1935) quoted three sites for this species, as Chromatoiulus projectus genuinus (Verhoeff, 1907); these are Braseu (= Braşov), Socola and Barnova, all of which are in Romania.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.142 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207