Bibliographic record
Abstract
264. Enantiulus armatus (Ribaut, 1909) Leptophyllum armatum Ribaut, 1909. Distribution FR-FRA, GB-GRB. Atlantic. Habitat Forest and woodland - Fagus, Fraxinus, Quercus, Carpinus, Tilia, Acer, Populus, Castanea, Corylus. Under bark, in logs and in leaf litter. On several types of soil from clayey inundation forest to rendzinas on limestone, sandy areas and brown earths on metamorphic rocks. Mainly at low altitude but on high limestone plateaus (“causses”) and in volcanic areas up to at least 900 m in the Massif Central of France. In England found in mainly coastal and synanthropic sites including a golf course. Remarks As things stand at present, all the records of Enantiulus armatus from France are from a zone south and west of the River Loire. All the British records are from Devon and Cornwall in SW England. Unless it has been introduced into England it ought to be found in NW France. In so far as it is eurytopic it resembles its congener to the east, Enantiulus nanus (Latzel, 1884) (see below).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.028 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".