Reyes Habsburgo y Borbones y la música de México The Music of Mexico in the Hapsburg and Bourbon Periods
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resumen: A partir de una vasta investigación de la música virreinal contenida en los archivos catedralicios de las ciudades de México y de Puebla de los Ángeles, el artículo se propone demostrar que la música popular del México actual —manifestada principalmente en sones mestizos— se relaciona con los estilos que se encuentran en los villancicos catedralicios que fechan de la época de la administración de los reyes Habsburgos, a partir de la Conquista y hasta el segundo cuarto del siglo XVIII. Asimismo, propone justificar conclusiones paralelas a esta aseveración para demostrar la impopularidad de los gobiernos borbónicos entre el grueso de la población colonial, dada la escasa presencia de elementos derivados de los estilos “de conservatorio” de la música catedralicia de finales del siglo XVIII; y se describen a grosso modo los estilos musicales presentes en los archivos musicales de las catedrales de México y Puebla con el propósito de justificar estos planteamientos. Abstract: An encyclopaedic investigation of the music of the Viceregal period found in cathedral archives in Mexico City and Puebla de los Ángeles leads Stanford to argue here that popular Mexican music today – principally manifest in mestizo music – is related to the styles of cathedral Christmas carols of the Hapsburg period, i.e., from the Conquest through the second quarter of the 18 th century. In contrast, the paucity of late 18 th century Conservatory-style cathedral music in these archives suggests that Bourbon governments were unpopular with the colonial populations they administered. A general summary of the musical styles present (and absent) in the musical archives of Mexico City and Puebla justifies these conclusions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".