Cryptophagus tuberculosus Maklin 1853
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<i>Cryptophagus tuberculosus</i> Mäklin, 1853 <b>NEWFOUNDLAND:</b> Cow Head, August 13, 1949, E. Palmen (2 females, MZHF); Portugal Cove: Indian Meal Line, August 18, 1986, September 15, 1986 (2, MUN); Portugal Cove: Indian Meal Line, May 16, 1979 (1, AAFC); St. Barbe, July 26, 1949, E. Palmen (1 male, 2 females, MZHF); St. John’s, September 15, 1995, October 11, 1996, Biology 4150 (3, MUN); Upper Ferry, August 18, 1981, D. Langor (1, MUN). <b>NOVA SCOTIA: Annapolis Co.:</b> Annapolis Royal, July 30, 1941, H.T. Stultz, dried corn (1, ACNS); <b>Lunenburg Co.:</b> New Ross, August 1, 1990, M. Russell, in plastic wrapping on hay ladder (1, NSMC); <b>Colchester Co.:</b> Five Islands, June 16, 1995, C. Corkum, young coniferous forest, FIT (1 male, NSMC). <i>Cryptophagus tuberculosus</i> is newly recorded on insular Newfoundland, in Nova Scotia, and in Atlantic Canada (Fig. 3). This Holarctic species has previously record- ed in North America from Alaska, Alberta, Arizona, British Columbia, California, Colorado, Idaho, New Mexico, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming in western North America (Woodroffe and Coombs 1961), and in Maine and New Hampshire in eastern North America (Chandler 2001). In the Palaearctic region it is found in Scandinavia and northern Russia, east to the Russian Far East, Mongolia, and Inner Mongolia (Johnson et al. 2007). Woodroffe and Coombs (1961) reported it from coniferous trees, nests, and stored produce (especially dried fruit). In Nova Scotia it has been found on dried corn and in a coniferous forest. This is a highly variable, polytypic species which can be difficult to separate from <i>Cryptophagus subfumatus</i> Kraatz. The shape of the parameres, however, are quite distinctive (Woodroffe and Coombs 1961). The occurrence of <i>C. tuberculosus</i> in eastern North America is noteworthy. Woodroffe and Coombs (1961) drew attention to the wide Holarctic distribution of this species and its apparent absence in eastern North America. They also noted three “forms” of this species in western North America and suggested that the species was rather easily isolated by geographical or ecological barriers. They further proposed that the species may have dispersed to North America at a time when a land bridge existed across the Bering Strait. Therefore, the occurrence of <i>C. tuberculosus</i> in eastern North America may suggest that this species has a typical Holarctic distribution.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.078 | 0.032 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".