Bibliographic record
Abstract
Mesovelia mulsanti White, 1879 This is one of the most widely distributed species of the genus, occurring from Canada to Argentina in the Americas, as well as in the Hawaiian Islands where it was introduced (Gagné & Howarth 1975, Cordeiro & Moreira 2015). The first records from French Guiana are presented here. Material examined. FRENCH GUIANA: Cayenne — Remire-Montjoly, Lake Montjoly, N 0 4.92663, W 0 52.27654, 09.III.2014, (A. Khila; M. E. Santos; A. J. J. Crumière): 12 apterous males, 1 macropterous male, 6 apterous females, 1 macropterous female, 8 nymphs (IGFL). Matoury, mini-swamp before reaching the bridge of the Cayenne river, N 0 4.89942, W 0 52.36203, 10.III.2014, (A. Khila; M. E. Santos; A. J. J. Crumière): 1 apterous male, 5 macropterous males, 3 males with broken wings, 1 apterous female, 4 macropterous females, 1 female with broken wings, 2 nymphs (IGFL). Macouria, Crique Patate, puddle, N 0 4.94416, W 0 52.48671, 10.III.2014, (A. Khila; M. E. Santos; A. J. J. Crumière): 1 apterous male, 1 apterous female (IGFL).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".