Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pelmatops tangliangi Chen, 2010 (Figs. 71–74; 92, 99) Pelmatops tangliangi Chen, in Chen et al., 2010:3. Type-locality: Benggang, Menghai, Yunnan, China (HT ♂ IZCAS). Description (supplement to the species description of Chen et al., 2010). Compound eye smooth and round, with sharp projection at end in male; ommatidia different in size, those located on projection slightly larger (Fig. 92). Occipital protuberance of male flat, rectangular, not clearly delimited from occiput, setae on its posterior margin medium-sized and numerous (Fig. 99). Distribution. China (Yunnan), India, Vietnam. Specimens examined. CHINA: Yunnan: Xishuangbanna 1750m, November 2008, J. Hu & L. Tang, 1 HT ♂ (IZCAS). INDIA: Ranikhet, June 1949, I. M. Newell, 1 PT ♂ (BPBM); Khasi Hills, Assam, purchased from E. Heyne, 97–82, 1 ♂, 1♀ (BMNH, checked by D.L. Hancock, pers. comm.). VIETNAM: Vinh Phu Prov.: Tam Dao, 500–1000m, 2 June1997, R. Matsumoto, 1 PT ♂ (OMNH); Tam Dao, 1200m, 13–14 May 2012, Eduard Jendek, 2 ♂ (CNC, examined by photos and videos, which taken by Eduard Jendek and sent to the first author). Biology. Eduard Jendek, a Canadian entomologist working in the Ottawa Plant Laboratory, Canadian Food Inspection Agency, observed and took photos (Figs. 71–74) and videos of this species in Vietnam in the summer of 2012. According to him, three of the individuals occurred in a small area (6 square meters) at the side of a jungle trail, close to the margin with an open space. The flies were flying relatively slowly and were cumbersome. The first author visited the type locality of this species in Yunnan, China in autumn of 2012, and found this site to be very similar to the site which was described above for P. ichneumoneus in landscape, vegetation, humidity and temperature.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.009 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".