Saigusaia pikei BLAGODEROV & GRIMALDI 2004, new species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Saigusaia pikei, new species Figure 37, Plate 4B DIAGNOSIS: Distinguished from the living species by Sc long, meeting C just before RS base. DESCRIPTION (see also table 3): Body length = 2.84 mm, wing length = 1.80 mm. Head: Ocelli three, each slightly raised, very close. Eyes pubescent. Vertex and clypeus setulose. Flagellum 14segmented, flagellomeres cylindrical, with length slightly greater than width. Mouthparts form short proboscis, length is onehalf the head height. Only three palpal segments seen: antepenultimate segment swollen, penultimate and apical ones narrower, bacilliform. Length ratio 1:1.7:2.7. Thorax: Antepronotum with two long setae. Scutum with strong, curved lateral, dorsocentral and acrostichal setae. Mediotergite and laterotergites bare. Scutellum with 5 pairs of rather short setae. Metepisternum with two long setae dorsally. Wing: Costa ends beyond tip of R 5, onethird distance between tips of R 5 and M 1. Stem of R, R 1 and R 5 with rows of dorsal and ventral setae. R 1 and R 5 straight. Sc meets C just before RS base. Sc 2 apical, proximal to base of M3. Crossvein rm 1.5Χ length of RS1 and 0.3Χ length of M3 section. Fork of M 1 and M 2 2.7Χ length of M3. M 1 and M 2 fork campanulate, veins straight, with a few ventral setae apically. Base of M 3+4 and CuA fork proximal to base of M 1 and M 2 fork, M 3+4 and TABLE 3 Comparison of Boletina, Saigusaia, and Saigusaia pikei n.sp. CuA curved caudally. Legs: Tibial bristles 2Χ tibial diameter. Tarsal claw with one tooth. Abdomen: Sternite 8 with two triangular, rounded, caudal lobes covered by long setae. Cerci twosegmented. Basal segment large and broad, apical one 0.5Χ the length and 0.5Χ the width of basal one; both setose. MATERIAL: Holotype TMPD P79.15.7.21, female. Canada: Alberta, Grassy Lake, coll. T. Pike. ETYMOLOGY: The species epithet is patronymic for Dr. T. Pike, who collected the specimen. COMMENTS: This species has almost all the features of Saigusaia (table 3, see also Vockeroth, 1980), so despite the long Sc vein its placement in the genus is virtually certain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".