Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cystidicola Fischer, 1798 Synonyms: Fissula Lamarck, 1801; Ophiostoma Rudolphi, 1801; Ancyracanthus Schneider, 1866; Pseudancyracanthus Skryabin, 1925; Comephoronema Layman, 1933 Preamble: Two species of Cystidicola are currently recognised: C. farionis and C. stigmatura. The species differ in adult and egg morphology, longevity, reproductive strategy, and host and geographical range (Miscampbell et al. 2004). C. farionis is short lived (about one year) and occurs in Salmonidae and Osmeridae in North America and Eurasia, whilst C. stigmatura is long lived (over 10 years) and occurs exclusively in Salvelinus spp. in North America. Suggestions over the years that Canadian fishes may harbour “strains” of C. farionis or that there is a third Cystidicola species (see Miscampbell et al. 2004, and references therein) are best addressed by further morphological and molecular studies. Generic diagnosis (after Ko & Anderson 1969). Cystidicolidae. Pseudolabia small. Mouth opening dumb-bell shaped; armed with two rows of teeth, an exterior row comprising one large ventral, one large dorsal, two prominent lateral, and numerous small teeth in the form of fine serrations, and an internal row of 16 large teeth, four in each quadrant formed by the ventral, dorsal, and lateral teeth (Fig. 59 A). Buccal cavity long and slender. Oesophagus divided into short anterior muscular and long posterior glandular portions. Excretory pore posterior to nerve ring, near junction of muscular and glandular oesophagus (Fig. 59 B). Vulva slightly posterior to mid–body length. Tail short. Fully developed eggs bear lateral and/or polar filaments or a pair of lateral “lobes” (“floats” or “mammillations” in litt.). Parasitic in swim bladder of fishes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.030 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".