Quedius (Raphirus) impressiventris, sp. nov.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Quedius (Raphirus) impressiventris sp. nov. (Figs. 42–50) Type locality. People’s Republic of China: Sichuan, Gongga Shan, Lake above Camp 2, 2750 m. Type material. Holotype (male) and allotype (female): China: CHINA, Sichuan, Gongga Shan, Lake abv. Camp 2 2750 m, 24.VII. 1994 A. Smetana [C 20]. In the Smetana collection, Ottawa, Canada (to be eventually deposited in the Muséum d’histoire naturelle, Genève, Switzerland). Paratypes: China: [Sichuan]: same data as holotype [89] (ASC, MSC); same data as holotype, but 25. VII.1994, A. Smetana [C 23], [33] (ASC); same data as holotype, but 27.VII. 1994, A. Smetana [C 27], [10] (ASC); Gongga Shan, above Camp 3, 3050 m, 22.VII. 1994, A. Smetana [C 18], [5] (ASC); Gongga Shan, Hailuogou, head of Glacier 1, 2850 m, 9. VII.1996, 29°35ʹN 10°200ʹE C 57 / collected by A. Smetana, J. Farkač and P. Kabátek [5] (ASC); Gongga Shan, Hailuogou, Lake above Camp 2, 2750 m, 29°35ʹN 10°200ʹE, 4.VII. 1998, A. Smetana [C 74] / 1998 China Expedition J. Farkač, D. Král, J. Schneider & A. Smetana [5] (ASC); Gongga Shan, Hailuogou, for. above Camp 2, 2800 m, 29°35ʹN 10°200ʹE, 5.VII. 1998, A. Smetana [C 75] / 1998 China Expedition J. Farkač, D. Král, J. Schneider & A. Smetana [2] (ASC); Gongga Shan, Hailuogou, in front of Glacier 1, 2850 m, 29°35ʹN 10200ʹE, 7.VII. 1998, A. Smetana [C 76] / 1998 China Expedition J. Farkač, D. Král, J. Schneider & A. Smetana [42] (ASC, NMW); W-Sichuan (7) Daxue Shan, W Kangding 3003ʹ13ʺN 10157ʹ11ʺE 2700–2800 m, 24.05. 1997, M. Schülke [1] (MSC); W-Sichuan Ya’an Pref., Shimian Co. Daxue Shan, road betw. Anshunghang - Wanba, 20 km WSW Shimian, 1500 m, 9.VII. 1999, leg. A. Pütz [1] (APC). Description. In all external characters similar to Q. aureiventris BERNHAUER, 1915 (detailed description in SMETANA 1988: 250), and different mainly by the male sexual characters, particularly by the shape of the aedoeagus, and by the uniformly dark pubescence of the elytra (elytral pubescence in Q. aureiventris is a mixture of dark and golden or golden-yellowish hairs). M a l e. First four segments of front tarsus markedly dilated (about the same way as those of Q. aureiventris), sub-bilobed, each densely covered with tenent setae ventrally, segment 2 about as wide as apex of tibia, segment 4 narrower than preceding segments. Sternite 8 with two long setae on each side, with wide, moderately deep medioapical emargination, not appreciably different from that of Q. aureiventris (Fig. 42), small triangular area before emargination flattened and smooth. Genital segment with tergite 10 wider and less setose than that of Q. aureiventris (Figs. 43, 51); sternite 9 wider than that of Q. aureiventris, with apex subtruncate to subemarginate (Figs. 44, 52), with two slightly differentiated apical setae. Aedoeagus (Figs. 45–49) narrow, elongate, similar to that of Q. aureiventris, but median lobe widely attenuate in middle portion (almost parallelsided in Q. aureiventris), anteriorly distinctly widened before narrowed into apical portion with subacute apex (Figs. 45, 47), apical portion darkened (in Q. aureiventris median lobe not widened before apical portion and apical portion not darkened), medial carina on face adjacent to paramere longer than that of Q. aureiventris, appearing as minute dent in lateral view; paramere parallelsided, similar to that of Q. aureiventris but in general wider, with arcuate apex not quite reaching apex of median lobe; four fine setae at apical margin (Figs. 48, 49), medial setae sometimes longer than lateral ones (Fig. 49), two similar setae at each lateral margin below apex; sensory peg setae on underside of paramere numerous, forming two variably long, slightly irregular, rows not appreciably different from those of Q. aureiventris (Figs.48, 49). F e m a l e. First four segments of front tarsus not appreciably dilated. Tergite 10 of genital segment somewhat wider and longer than that of Q. aureiventris, less densely setose (Figs. 50, 53). Length 4.3–5.0 mm. Geographical distribution. Quedius impressiventris is at present known from the Daxue Shan range, particularly from Gongga Shan, in Sichuan. Bionomics. The long series of specimens collected at the lake above Camp 2 on Gongga Shan was taken by submerging soaking wet moss and various vegetation, growing along the edges of the shallow lake, into water. Quedius euryalus Smetana, 1997 was collected in the same habitat. Recognition and comments. Quedius impressiventris and the following species, Q. tergimpressus, are both similar and closely related to the Himalayan Q. aureiventris, as it is stipulated in the respective descriptions. They both differ from Q. aureiventris by the characters given in the descriptions, and they differ from each other by the characters on the aedoeagus. It is the distinct anterior widening of the median lobe of the aedoeagus (Fig. 47) that is typical for Q. impressiventris and is absent in Q. tergimpressus (Fig.58), and the fusiform paramere (Fig. 57) that characterizes Q. tergimpressus. Etymology. The specific epithet is a combination of the Latin adjective impressus, - a, - um (impressed) and the noun venter, - tris, m (abdomen). It refers to the inconspicuous impressions on the abdominal tergites.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".