MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950143165 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6564822

Molossus pretiosus G. S. Miller 1902

2019· article· en· W6950143165 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicPhilosophy and History of Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnoutDorsumSkullForamenCactus

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

18. Miller’s Mastiff Bat Molossus pretiosus French: Molosse de Miller / German: Mille-rSamtfledermaus / Spanish: Moloso de Miller Other common names: Miller's Free-tailed Bat Taxonomy. Molossus pretiosus G. S. Miller, 1902, “La Guaira [Distrito Federal], Venezuela.” This species is monotypic. Distribution. Known from scattered localities in S Mexico (Guerrero and Oaxaca), E Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana, and CW & E Brazil; also on Trinidad I. Descriptive notes. Head-body 72-80 mm, tail 39-44 mm, ear 16-17 mm, hindfoot 10-13 mm, forearm 44-51 mm; weight 20-28 g. Miller’s Mastiff Batis larger than all its congeners, except the Black Mastiff Bat (M. rufus). Dorsal hairs of Miller's Mastiff Bat are dark brown or black, with or without very thin pale band at bases, not covering more than one-quarter the hair length. Reddish orange dorsal pelage also occurs in some populations. Dorsal pelage is short (2-3 mm). Ventral pelage is lighter than dorsal pelage. Ears are rounded and arise from same point on forehead. Tragusis small, and antitragus is constricted at its base. Upperlip and snout are smooth and lack any medial ridge. Face, wings, and uropatagium are dark brown to black. Skull has elongated braincase, quadrangular occipital region, and infraorbital foramen opening laterally in frontal view. Basioccipital pits are very deep. I” is elongated, with parallel or convergenttips, but rarely thick and spatulated. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 48 and FN = 66. Habitat. Dry and semideciduous forests, tropical dry forests, riparian forests, grassland savannas, caatinga, cerrado, dry woodlands, and cactus and thorn scrub. Food and Feeding. Miller’s Mastiff Bat is an aerial insectivore, and Coleoptera, Lepidoptera, Hemiptera, and Hymenoptera have been found inits feces. Breeding. Miller’s Mastiff Bat is polyestrous, and females can be simultaneously pregnant and lactating. In Nicaragua, pregnant females were reported in March-April and June and pregnant females with juveniles in mid-August. In Costa Rica, pregnant females were captured in May, July, and October, and young were present in July and October. Activity patterns. Miller's Mastiff Bats have been observed leaving their roosts 5-15 minutes after sunset. They roost in caves, buildings, and hollow trees. Black-and-white owls (Ciccaba nigrolineata) are known to prey on Miller’s Mastiff Bats. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Miller’s Mastiff Bat forms small groups of up to ten individuals. Colonies can be composed of individuals of only one sex, which are usually sexually inactive, or adults of both sexes and young. In reproductive colonies, females are more abundant than males, indicating a polygynous mating system. It has been found roosting with other congeners such as Pallas’s Mastiff Bat (Molossus molossus) and other genera such as the Broad-eared Free-tailed Bat (Nyctinomops laticaudatus). Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. Miller’s Mastiff Bats occurs in a number of protected areas, has a wide distribution, and is tolerant of some habitat modification. Bibliography. Claudio, Silveira, Farias & Lapenta (2018), Dolan (1989), Dolan & Carter (1979), Eger (2008), Freeman (1979, 1981), Ibanez et al. (1992), Jennings et al. (2000), Jones, Smith & Turner (1971), LaVal (1977), LaVal & Fitch (1977), Loureiro, Gregorin & Perini (2018), Marinkelle & Cadena (1972), Nogueira et al. (2008), Pineda et al. (2008), Simmons (2005), Timm & LaVal (1998).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.093

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0280.015

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.166 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicPhilosophy and History of ScienceFrench-language works237,207