Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acerocnema Becker, 1894 Acerocnema Becker, 1894: 154. Type species, Cordylura breviseta Zetterstedt (original designation). Pachystyla Lioy, 1864: 1005. Type species, Cordylura macrocera Meigen (original designation). Preoccupied by Pachystyla Moerch, 1852 (Mollusca). Diagnosis. Small-bodied flies with body colour either yellow or black and shiny (Figs 15–22). Overall species are weakly bristled. Head is rounded with a variable number of setae. Arista pubescent to bare; length of arista as long as first flagellomere. Postpedicel generally much longer compared to other species of Scathophagidae. Palpus spatula-shaped. Setae on head and body yellow or black. Scutal setae are variable in appearance and number, notopleurals, supra-alar, postalar and dorsocentrals distinct. Scutum also with fine soft hairs among the setae. Scutellum always with strong apical and lateral setae. Vein R 1 usually bare, if setulae present confined to distal portion. Legs with a few extremely weak setae. Abdomen with fine hairs over surface. Male sternite 5 enlarged, deeply bilobate posteriorly, apical lobes narrow to broad. Epandrium on dorsal surface of abdomen, surstylus, cercus and tergite 5 all jutting out from ventral surface of abdomen. Surstylus flattened, slender and at times broadened apically (Figs 1–8). Cerci fused basally with deeply divided process underneath. Female terminalia (Fig. 14) very similar to Gimnomera. Segments beyond 6 compressed; terminal segments strongly sclerotized and compressed, with spine-like projections. Remarks. DNA barcode data is available for two identified Nearctic species of Acerocnema (merga, fasciventris) and an additional unidentified species (Fig. 27) (see Discussion section for further details).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.021 | 0.005 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".