Bibliographic record
Abstract
Genus Primno GuérinMéneville, 1836 Primno GuérinMéneville, 1836b: 2. Euprimno Bovallius, 1889: 397. Type species Primno macropa GuérinMéneville, 1836 by monotypy. The holotype is in the ANSP (CA 2685), in the GuérinMéneville collection (No. 435): once alcohol preserved, now dry (see Zeidler 1997). Diagnosis Body length up to 21 mm, but usually about 10 mm. Head, quadrate with small rostrum. Pereonites 1 & 2 separate. Pereopods 3, 4 & 6 simple, with some teeth on margin of carpus and sometimes also merus. Pereopod 5 prehensile, entire anterior margin of carpus dentate, with several long teeth separated by groups of short teeth; propodus shorter than carpus; dactylus appears to be extension of propodus with limited articulation. Pereopod 7 with all articles present, but basis longer than remaining articles combined; dactylus digitiform, with ring of spinules at apex in female. Gills without folds. Six species. Remarks Bowman (1978) revised this genus and recognised four species previously lumped as P. macropa. Additional species have been described subsequently by Bowman (1985) and Sheader (1986). Species of Primno are often found in abundance in nearsurface waters (e.g. Stephensen 1924, Yoo 1971, Thurston 1976, Tranter 1977, Young & Anderson 1987, Vinogradov 1991). Their association with gelatinous hosts remains to be established, and may be limited to juvenile stages. The adults are active swimmers, and larval development is more direct than in other hyperiideans, resulting in the release of active juveniles from the marsupium of females. Bowman (1978) suggests that the modified dactylus of pereopod 7 of females may be used to transfer juveniles from the marsupium to a gelatinous host, as has been observed in Vibilia (Laval 1963). The only record of an association with gelatinous plankton is that of Daniel (1973), who found “ Euprimno macropus ” within the posterior nectophores of the siphonophores Abylopsis tetragona and Sulculeolaria chuni. This record however, may not represent a true association as the position of the hyperiidean does not rule out the possibility of a passive introduction during sampling (Laval 1980). Bowman (1978) provides a summary of biological information on Primno and Yoo (1972), Ikeda (1995) and Sheader and Batten (1995) provide additional information. Key to the species of the genus Primno 1. Pereopod 5; longer teeth on anterior margin of carpus nearly as long as width of carpus ....................................................................................................................................... 2 Pereopod 5; length of longer teeth on anterior margin of carpus about 0.3–0.5 x width of carpus ........................................................................................................................ 5 2. Pereopod 5; row of teeth on anterior margin of carpus with short tooth proximally .... 3 Pereopod 5; row of teeth on anterior margin of carpus with one of the longer teeth proximally .................................................................................................................... 4 3. Distribution restricted to southern hemisphere; subantarctic province. Rostrum conforming to contour of head, about 0.4x width of head .................................................... ............................................................................... P. macropa GuérinMéneville, 1836 Distribution restricted to North Pacific; subarctic province. Rostrum truncate, limited to space between first antennae P. abyssalis (Bowman, 1968) 4. Pereopod 7; basis length about 1.2 x length of remaining articles combined................. .............................................................................................. P. johnsoni Bowman, 1978 Pereopod 7; basis length more than 1.5x length of remaining articles combined .......... .............................................................................................. P. latreillei Stebbing, 1888 5. Pereopod 5; length of longer teeth on anterior margin on carpus about 0.3x width of carpus. Pleon subequal in length to pereon ........................ P. brevidens Bowman, 1978 Pereopod 5; length of longer teeth on anterior margin of carpus about 0.5x width of carpus. Pleon length about 1.4x length of pereon .................... P. evansi Sheader, 1986
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.027 | 0.007 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".