Elephantomyia (Elephantomyia) vesca Ribeiro & Amorim, 2002, sp.n.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Elephantomyia (Elephantomyia) vesca sp.n. Figures 2025 Etymology. Form Latin, weak, thin, little. Material examined. Holotype, male. Threedimensional specimen mounted in slide, in Canada Balsam. Brasil, São Paulo, Parque Estadual Intervales. 30 / x / 2000. At light. G. C. Ribeiro. MZUSP. Color (based in the specimen when still in alcohol). Head, thorax and terminalia pale yellow; abdomen light brown. Head (Figs. 2021). Rostrum length, 4.28mm; antenna length, 1.28 mm; maxillary palpus length, 0.20 mm; third segment of palpus 2.45 times longer than fourth; head capsule length, 0.68 mm. Thorax (Fig. 22). Thorax length / height, 1.76 / 1.44 mm; tibial spurs lacking. Wing (Fig. 23). Wing length / width, 6.20 / 1.50 mm; crossvein scr before mid point between tip of R1 and origin of RS; discal cell ca. 2.4 times longer than wide; vein A1 ca. 1.6 times longer than A2. Abdomen. Abdomen length, 3.84 mm. Male terminalia (Figs. 2425). Gonocoxite length / maximum width, 0.40 / 0.17 mm; gonocoxite enlarged near midlength by a medial protuberance, with longest hairs at lateral and apical borders; gonostylus terminal; inner gonostylus length, 0.22 mm; inner gonostylus broadbased, curved at tip; outer gonostylus length, 0.20 mm; aedeagus long and narrow.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.010 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".