MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950191081 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5583167

Ophiocten hastatum $ Lyman 1878

2019· article· en· W6950191081 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMarine Ecology and Invasive Species
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBayRidgeTrough (economics)Structural basinDeep sea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ophiocten hastatum Lyman, 1878 Reports for the Azores: Ophiocten hastatum $ Lyman, 1878: 103, pl. 5, figs. 133–134, 1882: 82–83, pl. 9, figs. 10–11; $ Koehler 1898: 42–44, 73, pl. 7, figs. 32, 33, 1909: 165; Mortensen 1927a: 246; $ Paterson et al. 1982: 117–119, fig. 5; Paterson 1985: 129, fig. 49; Gage et al. 2004: 849–864, figs. 1–84; García-Diez et al. 2005: 49; $ Martynov & Litvinova 2008: 83, fig. 3C; Smirnov et al. 2014: 202–203; Ophiocten longispinum $ Koehler, 1896a: 204–205; Ophiura hastata (Lyman, 1878) — Guille 1982: 80, figs. 5, 6, 7a–b. Type locality: off Marion Island, Southern Ocean (46°46’S, 45° 31’E). See: Lyman (1878); Paterson et al. (1982); Guille (1982); Martynov & Litvinova (2008). Occurrence: cosmopolitan, found in the Atlantic, Southern, and Pacific Oceans (Guille 1982); in the Atlantic from Labrador basin east in the Rockall Trough south to the Bay of Biscay (Paterson 1985), including the Mid-Atlantic Ridge from Reykjanes Ridge south to the Azores (Martynov & Litvinova 2008); with exception of the reports for the Labrador Basin, all other records from the West Atlantic are misidentifications of O. gracilis (Paterson et al. 1982). Depth: 843– 4,700 m (Grieg 1932, Guille 1982); AZO: 1,830 –2,107 m (Lyman 1878, Martynov & Litvinova 2008). Habitat: soft bottoms, muddy sand to ooze (Koehler 1909); opportunistic (Gage et al. 2004). Larval stage: planktotrophic (Gage et al. 2004). Remarks: Lyman (1878, 1882) described Ophiocten hastatum on the basis of material taken by H.M.S. Challenger in Southern Ocean deep waters. Lyman (1878, 1882) also found two specimens of this species among the material collected by the same cruise in Azorean waters (sta 78: 37°24’N, 25°13’W, 1,830 m). Koehler (1896a) described a new species Ophiocten longispinum from the material collected by Hirondelle in the Azores (sta 184: 40°05’N, 27°27’46”W, 1,850 m). Later, Koehler (1898) recanted his previous identification, changing it to O. hastatum and completed Lyman’s original description of this species using Hirondelle material from the archipelago. Koehler (1909) also identified this species at several Princesse Alice stations located inside Azorean waters. More recently, Martynov & Litvinova (2008) identified this species in Azorean northern waters (G.O. Sars, MAR–ECO cruise, sta 42/368: 42°48’N, 29°38’W, 2,063 –2,107 m).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Ecology and Invasive SpeciesFrench-language works237,207