Bibliographic record
Abstract
Phthinia miranda Zaitzev, 1984 Figs. 25–29 Material examined: ♂, ♀ (on same pin)[SEMC], USA: MI: Cheboygan Co., VII–31–1949, mating pair, G.W. Byers; ♂ [ISUI], USA: MN: Clearwater Co., Lake Itasca, IX–1 1950, Jean Laffoon; 2 ♂♂ [UNH], USA: NH: Coos Co., 1 mi. NE East Inlet Dam, VIII–22 / IX–12–86, D.S. Chandler, Malaise; 2 ♂♂ [UNH], USA: NH: Carr Co., The Bowl, 2.5 mi NW Wonalancet, VII–12 /19–1984, D.S. Chandler, Malaise trap; ♂ [UNH], USA: NH: Carr Co., The Bowl, 2.5 mi NW Wonalancet, VI–28 /26–1984, D.S. Chandler, Malaise trap; ♂ [ISUI], USA: NY: Hamilton Co., e. foot of West Notch Mt., 1900’, 43º20.6’N, 74º37.2’W, Aug. 6, 1961, Dick L. Deonier; ♂ [ISUI], USA: NY: 7 mis. so. town of Long Lake, 26 Aug. 1956, Jean L. Laffoon; ♂ [ISUI], USA: PA: Clarion Co., Cook St. For., trail to “Forest Cathedral” from Toms Run., Aug. 11 1961, Jean L. Laffoon; ♂ [CNCI], CANADA: N.B.: Kouchibouguac N.P., 5 VII 1977, J.R. Vockeroth, code 54862; ♂ [CNCI], CANADA: N.S.: CBHNt. Pk., North Mt. 400m, PG766864, damp sphagnum fen, 4 VII 1983, J.R. Vockeroth; ♂ [CNCI], CANADA: ONT: Orleans, Chapel Hill, 1 IX 1997, J.R. Vockeroth; ♂ [CNCI], CANADA: ONT: Carleton Place, 7.5 km W, 14.X.00, woods, L. Masner, YPT; ♂, ♀ [ISUI], CANADA: QUEBEC: Ile Jesus, 4 mis. no. Montreal, Aug. 19, 1956, Jean L. Laffoon; ♂ [CNCI], CANADA: QUE: Duncan Lake Nr. Rupert, 19 VII 1971, J.F. McAlpine; ♂ [CNCI], CANADA: QUE: Duncan Lake Nr. Rupert, 31 VII 1971, J.F. McAlpine; ♂ [CNCI], CANADA: QUE: Knowlton Ldg., 17 VII 1968, J.R. Vockeroth. Diagnosis and comments. Phthinia miranda is most similar to P. lobata and P. tanypus. However, it can be distinguished by the two subequal spines of the gonostylus; P. lobata only has one spine and in P. tanypus the two spines are unequal in length. Phthinia miranda can also be distinguished from P. tanypus by the triangular, apically pointed aedeagal complex (Fig. 28); this structure is somewhat rectangular and apically truncate in P. tanypus (Figs. 47–48). Discussion. The male terminalia of P. m i r a nd a was correctly illustrated, but incorrectly identified as P. tanypus by Fisher (1937; Plate 11, Figs. 10–11). Zaitzev (1984; Figs. 3.4, 4.3) has also illustrated the male terminalia of P. miranda. Bionomics. Phthinia miranda was previously known only from the holotype collected in New Hampshire. This species is restricted to the northeastern Nearctic region with records from Ontario, Quebec, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, Minnesota, Michigan, New York, Pennsylvania, and New Hampshire. Seasonal distribution is June–October with the majority of records July–August. Flies have been collected from 400 m – 579 m, in Malaise traps, in woods, and in a damp sphagnum fen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.019 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".