MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950198269 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6234335

Leptochiton belknapi Dall 1878

2008· article· en· W6950198269 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Biology and Ecology Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQueen (butterfly)PanamaSingle specimenSea levelNorth sea

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leptochiton belknapi Dall, 1878 Leptochiton belknapi Dall 1878: 1. While the species was originally described from the Bering Sea of the Alaskan Aleutian Islands, from a depth of 1840 m “only”, there are subsequent deeper records of this species from the following localities: ­ specimen number unknown; [described as Leptochiton benthus, which is a junior synonym] from the North Pacific, 15° north of Hawaii (35°41'N, 157°42'E), 4206 m (Haddon 1886) ­ specimen number unknown; [described as Lepidopleurus mesogonus, which is a junior synonym] from Canada, British Columbia, off the Queen Charlotte Islands [53°06’N, 132°14’W], 2904 m (Dall 1902) ­ specimen number unknown; [described as Lepidopleurus halistreptus, which is a junior synonym] from Mexico, off Acapulco (14°46'N, 98°40'W), 3436 m (Dall 1902) [locality data from Dall 1908] ­ 3 specimens [described as Lepidopleurus giganteus, which is a junior synonym] from Indonesia, south of Sulawesi Tengarra, Banda Sea (06°24'S, 124°39'E), 2798 m (Nierstrasz 1905) ­ specimen number unknown; [described as Lepidopleurus opacus, which is a junior synonym] from the Gulf of Panama (07°05'30''N, 79°40'W), 2323 m (Dall 1908) ­ specimen number unknown; [described as Lepidopleurus opacus] from between the Galapagos Islands and the Peruvian coast (04°33'S, 87°42.5'W), 3667 m (Dall 1908) ­ 1 specimen [as Lepidopleurus (Leptochiton) benthus (Haddon, 1886)] from the eastern Pacific (15°N, 125°W), 4000 m (Hanselman 1977) ­ Lepidopleurus benthus (Haddon, 1886) was generally mentioned as occurring at a depth below 4000 m (Sirenko 1977) ­ 4 specimens [as Leptochiton alveolus] from the United States of America, Oregon, off Lincoln County (44°33.5'N, 125°14.6'W), 2000 m (Ferreira 1979) [this is “CASIZ RV Ancona ”, data from: http:// www.calacademy.org/research/izg/iz_coll_db/index.asp] ­ 3 specimens [as Leptochiton alveolus] from the United States of America, California, 10 miles SE off Farallon Islands, SW by S1/4 S (37°48'N, [122°58’W]), 2341–2741 m (Ferreira 1979) [this is “CASIZ USS Mulberry; RV Scofield ”, data from: http://www.calacademy.org/research/izg/iz_coll_db/index.asp] ­ 3 specimens [as Leptochiton alveolus] from Mexico, off Nayarit, Las Tres Marias Islands (21°25'N, [106°28’W]), 2996–2999 m (Ferreira 1979) [this is “CASIZ 009520”, data from: http://www.calacademy.org/research/izg/iz_coll_db/index.asp] ­ 1 specimen [as Leptochiton alveolus] from Japan, near Northern Honshu, 2500 m (Ferreira 1979) [this is “CASIZ 001818”, data from: http://www.calacademy.org/ research/izg/iz_coll_db/index.asp] ­ 1 specimen [as Leptochiton alveolus] from off Baja California Sur southwest of Cabo San Lucas (22°30.8'­ 22°37.2'N, 110°03.8'­ 110°15.5'W), 2507–2891 m (Ferreira 1980) ­ 1 specimen from off northeastern Honshu, Japan (38°21.7'N, 143°25.9'E), 2930–3020 m (Wu & Okutani 1984) ­ 4 specimens from south of Izu­Shoto, Japan (30°37.0'N, 140°40.5'E), 2140 m (Wu & Okutani 1984) ­ 1 specimen from Izu­Shoto, Japan (31°58.1'N, 140°21.0'E), 2230–2245 m (Wu & Okutani 1984) ­ 1 specimen from the Philippines (06°08'N, 125°58'E), 2800 m (Kaas 1990) ­ 2 specimens from the Philippines (05°02'N, 125°15'E), 3250 m (Kaas 1990) ­ 1 specimen from the Philippines (14°05'N, 120°02'E), 2050 m (Kaas 1990) ­ specimen number unknown; from the Commander Islands [54°48’N, 166°59’E], 100–4400 m (Sirenko & Agapova 1997)

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.048

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.042
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicMarine Biology and Ecology Research→French-language works237,207→