MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950220874 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6580696

Myotis keaysi J. A. Allen 1914

2019· article· en· W6950220874 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubgenusDorsumSubspeciesSkullSnout

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

387. Southern Hairy-legged Myotis Myotis keaysi French: Murin de Keays / German: Sidliches HaarfliRiges Mausohr / Spanish: Ratonero de Keays Other common names: Hairy-legged Myotis Taxonomy. Myotis ruber keaysi |. A. Allen, 1914, “Inca Mines (altitude 6000 feet |= 1829 m}), Peru (lar. 13° 30 S., long. 70º W.” Subgenus Pyzonix; ruber species group. Myotis keaysi was originally described as a subspecies of M. ruber and raised to the species level in 1973 based on morphology. Monotypic. Distribution. Known from highlands in Venezuela to Andes of Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, Bolivia, and NW Argentina. Descriptive notes. Head-body ¢. 56-61 mm, tail 29-41 mm, ear 11-14 mm, hindfoot 6-9 mm, “similarto its Neotropical congeners. Fur of the Southern Hairy-legged Myotis is medium to long (dorsal fur 5-8 mm; ventral fur 4-7 mm) and woolly. Dorsal hairs are bicolored, varying from medium brown to cinnamon-brown, with little contrast between bases and tips, although bases are darker. Ventral hairs are bicolored, with dark brown bases and light brown or yellowish tips. Hair color can vary seasonally. Ears are comparatively short, extending forward halfway from eye to nostril. Antitragal notch is barely evident. Membranes are mummy brown; plagiopatagium is broadly attached to foot at bases of toes. Fringe of hairs along trailing edge of uropatagium is absent; dorsal surface of uropatagium is covered by dense pelage, extending to middle oftail and not exceeding knees. Skull is medium-sized (greatest skull lengths 13-5-15- 2 mm, but generally greater than 14 mm); frontal bone is vertically sloped and noticeable laterally; palatal angle is acute (angle formed between palatal plane and plane of basicranium is greater than 30°); wider nasal angle is noticeable laterally (angle formed between nasals and plane of frontals is greater than 45°); parietal is inclined forward; occipital region is comparatively flattened posteriorly; sagittal crest is usually present, ranging from low to medium; and lambdoidal crests are always present, weakly to strongly developed. P? is aligned in tooth row and visible labially. Habitat. Moist Andean forests and mix of transitional and montane forests near Chacoan thornscrub vegetation at elevations of 550-2500 m (mostly above 2000 m). Food and Feeding. The Southern Hairy-legged Myotis is insectivorous and forages in forested areas and over water. Breeding. In Peru, Southern Hairy-legged Myotis were pregnant in July and non-reproductive in February, June, August, and December. Activity patterns. Activity of Southern Hairy-legged Myotis begins at sunset and ends c.1 hour before sunrise. Common roosting sites are caves, natural water wells, hollow trees, and abandoned mines. Movements, Home range and Social organization. No information. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The Southern Hairy-legged Myotis is widespread, presumably has a large population without decline, and occurs in protected areas. Bibliography. Allen (1914), Barquez & Diaz (20169), Barquez et al. (1999), Gamboa et al. (2017), Graham (1987), Hernandez-Meza et al. (2005), LaVal (1973b), Mantilla-Meluk & Mufoz-Garay (2014), Moratelli et al. (2013), Wilson (2008b).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.123

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.020

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→