MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950242375 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8282562

Chalcovietnamicus logunovi Yu, Maddison & Zhang 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6950242375 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumHolotypeSetaCarapaceFrench horn

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chalcovietnamicus logunovi Yu, Maddison & Zhang, sp. nov. (ẄDZffiḋff) Figs 29–40, 63–65, 142 Type material. Holotype: ♁ (UBCZ; KYU-SAL401), MALAYSIA: Selangor, Ulu Gombak Field Station, 3.325°N, 101.753°E, 250 m, 16–19 May 2005, leg. W. Maddison, D. Li, I. Agnarsson & J. Zhang, WPM#05-026. Paratypes: 2♁ 2♀ (UBCZ; KYU-SAL402 ~405), same data as holotype. Other material examined. 1♀ (UBCZ; KYU-SAL406), same data as holotype. Etymology. The specific epithet is in honor of Dr. Dmitri V. Logunov (Manchester Museum, UK), who is an expert in this group, and has offered much assistance to the authors in the study of jumping spider taxonomy. Diagnosis. Males can be distinguished from C. daiqini and C. marusiki sp. nov. by the presence of a retrolateral hump on the distal part of embolus, and the rather large and deep groove around the apical extension of embolus (Figs 63–65). Females can be distinguished by the relatively large atria and the slightly rounded spermathecae (Figs 35–36). Description. Male. Habitus as shown in Fig. 29. Measurements of holotype (KYU-SAL401): carapace 1.80 long; abdomen 1.86 long; measurements of eyes: AME 0.40, ALE 0.26, PME 0.08, PLE 0.21; measurements of legs: I 3.58 (1.07, 0.79, 0.81, 0.53, 0.38), II 2.59 (0.85, 0.39, 0.52, 0.48, 0.35), III 2.67 (0.94, 0.44, 0.41, 0.59, 0.29), IV 3.08 (0.98, 0.49, 0.60, 0.67, 0.34); leg formula 1432. Endite with anterior lateral subtriangular extension. Color in ethanol (Fig. 29): Body dark, covered with dense khaki setae except for face, palp and tibia I, these parts conspicuously black compared to other body parts; dorsal abdomen with indistinct hollow longitudinal light mark on axis, and three pairs of light setal bands on each side of posterior part (Fig. 29). Palp as in Figs 33–34, 37–38: Cymbium slightly longer than palpal bulb, cymbial process (CyP) present, slightly visible in ventral view of palp; tegular lobe wide and stout, distal part prolaterally pointed; short embolus sticking out of large and oblong embolic disc which hidden behind bulb, with retrolateral distal hump (RdH); small apical extension of embolus (aE) sticking out of wide and deep groove around itself; retrolateral tibial apophysis (RTA) straight, distal part digitiform. Female. Habitus as shown in Fig. 30. Measurements of paratype (KYU-SAL402): carapace length 1.74; abdomen length 1.86; measurements of eyes: AME 0.37, ALE 0.25, PME 0.06, PLE 0.21; measurements of legs: I 2.57 (0.81, 0.48, 0.52, 0.38, 0.38), II 2.36 (0.79, 0.36, 0.47, 0.41, 0.33), III 2.54 (0.78, 0.42, 0.41, 0.53, 0.40), IV 3.00 (0.98, 0.48, 0.56, 0.63, 0.35); leg formula 4132. Body form and color like male, but without anterior lateral subtriangular extension and present central setal tuft on sternum (Fig. 32); abdominal pattern like male, but more distinct. Vulva as in Figs 35–36, 39–40: copulatory ducts short, curved outward; spermathecae subspherical and wider than long, with accessory glands (AG) attached at its base. Natural history. Foliage dwellers. Distribution. Known only from the type locality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.023
Threshold uncertainty score0.046

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSpider Taxonomy and Behavior StudiesFrench-language works237,207