MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950242959 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6059521

Megistophylla formosana Wang & Li, new species

2016· article· en· W6950242959 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicDiatoms and Algae Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSetaHolotypeApex (geometry)DorsumBasal (medicine)Scutellum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Megistophylla formosana Wang & Li, new species Figs. 1, 3–4, 7, 9–10. Holotype male (Fig. 1). Body length 19.5 mm; width across humeri 8.7 mm. Color dark reddish brown on dorsal surface, venter and legs moderately shiny. Antennomeres reddish brown. Dorsum overall setiferous, setae tiny (high magnification for observation required); setae on disc of pronotum and elytra far smaller than diameter of puncture with exception of a row of long; sparse setae at base of head, anterior, and posterior margins of pronotum and base of elytra, respectively; long setae brown in color, 1–7 times longer than diameter of puncture. Head: Surface densely rugopunctate, punctures large. Clypeus (Fig. 3) with apex distinctly bilobed, anterior margin moderately reflexed, narrowed at base. Clypeofrontal suture clearly defined. Frons moderately raised. Basal carina slightly crescent, strongly raised. Antenna with 10 antennomeres, antennal club with 6 antennomeres, length of club subequal to antennomeres 1–4 combined, first antennomere of club slightly shorter than remaining club antennomeres; fourth basal antennomere greatly enlarged. Thorax: Pronotum widest at middle, anterolateral angles (Fig. 3) moderately to strongly protuberant with basolateral angles obtuse, basal half of lateral margin moderately serrate; lateral declivities with weak gibbosity at middle; anterior margin completely beaded with basal margin smooth; punctures same as those on clypeus, rarely confluent, punctures evenly distributed along midline (Fig. 4). Scutellum (Fig. 4) triangular in shape with 10 punctures in uneven distribution, punctures rarely with long setae. Prosternal process flat, weakly bilobed in shape. Elytra: Discal surface densely rugopunctate, densely confluent at sides of suture; sutural costa gradually broadening apically, densely punctate at margins or transversally rugopunctate over costa; costa becoming flat at apex. Abdomen: Pygidium wider than long; surface with setiferous punctures in uneven distribution, tiny setae same as those of elytral disc. Sternites 1–2, 5–6 with surface densely punctate; punctures in sternites 3–4 sparsely distributed, punctures setiferous; setae on sternites 3–4 tiny, intermixed on sternites 5–6 with much longer setae. Legs: Protibia tridentate. Protarsomeres 2–3 (Fig. 7) with dense setae aggregated at apices. Surface of profemora and mesofemora moderately distributed with hair-like, long setae; setae on metafemora shorter and more robust, metafemora slightly broadened at middle. Metatibia with upper apical spur reaching basal one-fourth of metatarsomere 2; lower apical spur slightly shorter than upper one. Genitalia: Parameres in lateral view with central concave area extended and concentrically wrinkled, apical upper margin distinctly swollen with tip broadly rounded (Fig. 9); upper margin of parameres gradually narrowing apically at apical one-third in dorsal view (Fig. 10). Female. Unknown. Variation. Body length 15.7–21.5 mm; width across humeri 7.8–9.5 mm. Dorsal body color dark reddish brown to rufotestaceous; antennae reddish brown to blackish brown; anterior margin of clypeus moderately to weakly reflexed; pronotal punctures usually evenly distributed along midline; scutellum usually with 10 or more punctures in uneven distribution, punctures rarely with long setae; elytral surface sometimes transversally rugopunctate over costa. Diagnosis. Megistophylla formosana is distinguished from the other Megistophylla species (except for M. xitoui) by its distinctly straight antennal club with length subequal to basal antennomeres (antennal club slightly to strongly curved and the length of club longer than basal antennomeres in other species); basal half of the pronotal lateral margins serrate (smooth in other species); and central concave area of the parameres wrinkled concentrically (non-concentrically wrinkled in other species). Type material. Male holotype and 61 male paratypes. The male holotype is pinned and with the following information on the label: “N. Taiwan: Taipei County (presently New Taipei City), Wulai, Nei Dong Logging Road, alt. ca. 850 m, 16/IV/2003 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li”. The holotype is deposited at the National Natural Science Museum, Taichung, Taiwan. Paratypes: Locality same as holotype, “ 7/IV/2003 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li” (1 male, in CCLI); “ 5/IV-10/V/2005 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li” (1 male, CCLI); “ 17/III/2003 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li” (1 male, CCLI); “ 11/IV/2003 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li” (1 male, CCLI); “ 18/IV/2003 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li” (1 male, CCLI); “ 31/III-26/IV/2004 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li” (2 males, CCLI); “ 5/IV-10/V/2005 by FIT, collr. C.-L. Li” (1 male, deposited at the Natural History Museum, London, United Kingdom (BMNH); “Taoyuan County: Fu-Fu Shan, 121°22’27’’E / 24°43’34’’N, alt. ca. 1,440 m, by FIT, 15-28/IV/2004, collr. C-L. Li” (4 males, CCLI); “Shih Lin, 121°25’20’’E / 24°38’58’’N, alt. ca. 1,180m, by FIT, 9/IV-17/V/2005, collr. C-L. Li” (5 males in Canadian Museum of Nature, Ottawa, Canada (CMNC), 6 males, CCLI); same locality, “ 1-17/V/2004 ” (20 males in CCLI; 4 males in Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt Universitat, Berlin, Germany (ZMHB); 2 males in Museum für Tierkunde, Senckenberg Naturhistorische Sammlungen Dresden, Germany (MTD); 2 males in Zentralmagazin Naturwissenschaftlicher Sammlungen der Martin-Luther-Universität Zoologische Sammlung, Halle (Saale), Germany (ZNS)); same locality, “ 20/V-14/VI/2004 ” (2 males, BMNH); “Ilan County: Fushan Botanical Garden, III-13-1991, Y. B. Fan” (1 male, Taiwan Forest Research Institute, Taipei, Taiwan (TFRI)); “Nantou County: Lienhuachih, V/6-VI/10/2002, C.S. Lin & W.T. Yang, Malaise trap (KCN)” (2 males, NMNS); same locality, “ II/ 14-III/7 /2 0 0 5, C.S. Lin & W.T. Yang, Malaise trap (KCN)” (2 males, NMNS); same locality, “ III/7-IV/11/2005, C.S. Lin & W.T. Yang, Malaise trap (KCN)” (2 males, NMNS); same locality, “Watersher No. 3, III/4-V/6/2003, C.S. Lin & W.T. Yang, Malaise trap (KCN)” (1 male, NMNS). Distribution. Northern and central Taiwan (Fig. 13). Etymology. The specific name refers to the historic name of Taiwan by the Spanish sailors in the 16th century indicating the first Megistophylla species recognized from Taiwan. Chinese name: 蓬萊脊頭多鰓金龜 Remarks. Megistophylla formosana has wider range in distribution, both in elevation (600–1440 m) and latitude (north throughout central Taiwan) than M. xitoui, the other species from Taiwan.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.207 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicDiatoms and Algae ResearchFrench-language works237,207