Capillaria (Capillaroides) catenata Van Cleave & Mueller 1932
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Capillaria (Capillaroides) catenata Van Cleave & Mueller, 1932 Synonym: Capillaria (Thominx) catenata Van Cleave & Mueller, 1932 Description (after Moravec 2001). With characteristics of the genus. Males: 7.70–9.04 long, 0.068 maximum width. Entire oesophagus 5.90–6.48 long, 40 stichocytes. Spicule apparently weakly sclerotized, 0.399–0.465 long, covered with transverse grooves except at extremities (Fig. 20 A). Posterior end rounded, somewhat inflated both sides, with two large ventro-lateral papillae. Cloacal opening subterminal, tail 0.018 long. Females: Gravid worms 10.98–12.27 long, maximum width 0.068–0.095. Muscular oesophagus 0.210–0.300 long, stichosome 5.60–6.29 long, 40–44 stichocytes. Nerve ring 0.063–0.096 from anterior end. Vulva 0.009–0.090 behind oesophago-intestinal junction, its lips not elevated. Vulvar appendage absent (Fig. 20 B). Relatively few eggs (ca 10) in uterus, in one row. Eggs 0.057–0.060 x 0.030–0.039 (possibly expanded by coverslip pressure). Site: intestine Hosts: Ambloplites rupestris (2); Catostomus commersoni (1); Oncorhynchus nerka (3, 4); Osmerus mordax (3, 4) Distribution: Ontario, Quebec Records: 1. Fantham & Porter 1948 (QC); 2. Dechtiar 1972a (ON); 3. Collins & Dechtiar 1974 (ON); 4. Dechtiar et al. 1988 (ON)
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".