MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950259684 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6162396

Agyneta barrowsi Chamberlin & Ivie 1944

2013· article· en· W6950259684 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMRI in cancer diagnosis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumCarapaceClawForamenSetaSternum

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Agyneta barrowsi (Chamberlin & Ivie 1944) Figs 354–360, map 23 Meioneta barrowsi Chamberlin & Ivie 1944: 83, f. 153–154. (Description Ƥ). Agyneta barrowsi Buckle et al. 2001: 100. (Transferred from Meioneta). Type material: Meioneta barrowsi Chamberlin & Ivie 1944, 3 HOLOTYPE, Ƥ ALLOTYPE from Georgia: Demorest, W 83º 32’: N 34º 33’, April 26, 1943, Wilton Ivie collector (AMNH). EXAMINED. Diagnosis: Males are diagnosed from all Agyneta by their smooth, leaf-shaped lamella characteristica (Fig. 354). Females are diagnosed from all species by their long and narrow epigynal slits almost reaching the anterior part of the epigynum (Fig. 358). From A. unimaculata by the S-shaped receptaculum of the internal genitalia (Fig. 359), elongated and straight in the latter (Fig. 314). Description: Male: Total length 1.72; carapace length 0.82, width 0.62. CEPHALOTHORAX: Carapace light orange-brown, shiny, finely reticulate; lightly suffused with gray along margin, radiating lines; sometimes with trident mark. Sternum suffused with dark gray. Clypeus height 2. Chelicerae light orange-brown apical part lighter; excavated, ~ 13 seta-tipped tubercles; promargin five denticles, retromargin four tiny denticles. Cheliceral stridulatory organ easily visible ~64 striae, narrowly spaced throughout. ABDOMEN: Uniformly light to dark gray. LEGS: Light yellow, basal part of femur darker; leg I total length: 3.17; leg III total length: 2.11; Tm I: 0.21, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Palpal retrolateral tibial apophysis long, smooth; dorsal tibial apophysis wide, smooth; two retrolateral trichobothria and one dorsal (Fig. 354). Cymbium triangular; glabrous depression present (Fig. 354); dorsal cymbial tubercle triangular, rugose; ventral cymbial tubercle small, smooth; prolateral notch shallow (Fig. 355). Paracymbium apical pocket short, anterior pocket long making a large cover, posterior pocket absent (Fig. 356). Embolus tip wide and pointed with wide and dentate prong; ventrally rugose; basally with one spur (sometimes missing); Fickert’s gland absent; ventral lamella transparent, serrated; thumb reaching embolus proper (Fig. 356). Embolus proper set apically, small (Fig. 356). Anterior terminal apophysis wide with numerous long and short protrusions; posterior terminal apophysis with pointed tip, with one large spur and two small spikes basally (Fig. 357 arrow); lamella characteristica wide, well sclerotized with rounded, serrated tip (Fig. 357). Female: Total length 1.57; carapace length 0.62, width 0.47. CEPHALOTHORAX: Coloration same as male. Clypeus height 2. Chelicerae light yellow-brown; promargin six teeth, retromargin five denticles. Cheliceral stridulatory organ visible ~57 striae, narrowly spaced. ABDOMEN: Same as male. LEGS: Same as male; palpal dark yellow-brown, tarsal claw absent; leg I total length: 2.48; leg III total length: 1.83; Tm I: 0.26, Tm IV: absent. GENITALIA: Epigynum with wide, rounded proximal part of scape; epigynal slits long and narrow; pit hook depression absent (Fig. 358); lateral lobes very long; stretcher and pit medium (Fig. 359). Median part of scape long and narrow; genital pores situated at base of lateral lobes pockets (Fig. 360). Internal genitalia with elongated, sinuous ventral receptacula and small oval dorsal one (Figs 359, 360). Other material examined: CANADA: Ontario: Hamilton, 1957, 13, B. Poole (CNC); shore of Mazinaw Lake near Cloyne, highway 41, 18–25. vii.1964, 1 Ƥ, A. Turnbull (CNC). Nova Scotia: Bridgewater, 0 1– 16.vii.1965, pitfall in oak stand, 73, B. Wright (CNC); Bridgewater, 13.vii.1966, 53, 16.viii.1966, 13, pitfall in oak stand, D. Embree (CNC). USA: Arkansas: Cove Creek, 10.iii.1061, pitfall in leaf litter in woods, 1Ƥ, (CAS); Jonesboro, 12.i.1967, 13, 19.i.1967, 1Ƥ, oak-hickory woods, Hite (CAS); Sumpter, iv-v.1964, 131Ƥ, Leslie (CAS); Sumpter, Pow-19, 08.vi.1962, 13, Leslie (CAS); Sumpter, Pow-58, 27.viii.1963, pine-oak woods, 131Ƥ, Leslie (CAS); Sumpter, Pow-165, 29.iii.1964, pine-oak woods, 1Ƥ, Leslie (CAS); Trafford, 27.vi.1963, 1Ƥ (CAS); no specific locality, 13.iv.1967, 1233Ƥ, Hite (CAS). Florida: 4.8km NW Maitland, 10.xii.1962, 13, W. Ivie (AMNH). Georgia: Demorest, 26.iv.1943, 4Ƥ (AMNH); NE Lula, 26.iv.1943, 2Ƥ (AMNH); Tallulah Falls, 28.iv.1943, 23 (AMNH). Louisiana: Hamburg, 03.v.1963, 1Ƥ (AMNH). Maryland: Patuxtent Wildlife Research Center, 11.v.1994, 1Ƥ, 16.v.1994, 2Ƥ, G. Hormiga (USNM). Michigan: 3.2km NE Fennville, 28.vii.1987, oak forest, 1Ƥ, W. Bosworth (USNM); 4.8km NE Fennville, 02.vii.1987, pitfall in old forest, 13, G. Price, R. Sliwinski (USNM); Rolla, 20.vi.1962, 13, H.E.F. (CAS); St. Charles, 1927, 1Ƥ, M. Brown (AMNH). Mississippi: NE Hattlesburg, 27.vii.1940, 13, D., S. Mulaik (AMNH). North Carolina: Greensboro, 15.vi.1949, leaf mold, 1Ƥ, D. Wray (AMNH). Nebraska: Lincoln, 1941, 13, M. Harbaugh (AMNH). New Jersey: Bass River State Forest, 10.v.1964, 134Ƥ, J., W. Ivie (AMNH). Tennessee: Smoky Mountain National Park, Chestnut Top Trail, 29.viii.1978, under rock, 1Ƥ, V. McNellus (TMM); UT Woodlot, west post, 10.vii.1975, oak-hickory, 13 (TMM). Virginia: Chancellorsville, 08.viii.1968, 2Ƥ, C. Alteri (AMNH). West Virginia: 16km SE Parkersurgh, 14.v.1967, 3Ƥ, B. Vogel (AMNH). Distribution: Eastern North America, west to Nebraska.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.041

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMRI in cancer diagnosisFrench-language works237,207