MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950261610 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5162576

Podisus placidus Uhler 1870

2021· article· en· W6950261610 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRadioactive contamination and transfer
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Index (typography)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Podisus placidus Uhler, 1870 New state record: Louisiana: Winn Par.: Winnfield, 12-V-1918, G. R. Pilate, det. Phillips (1♀ UMMZ). Montana: Flathead Co.: LaSalle, 5-VI-1944, William L. Jellison, det. Phillips (1♀ UMMZ). Oregon: Benton Co.: Sulphur Springs, 6 mi. N. Corvallis, 8-X-1962 [or 10-VIII-1962], [no collector] (1♀ UMMZ). Pennsylvania: Allegheny Co.: Pittsburgh, det. Phillips (1♀ DAR). Washington Co.: Canonsburg, Mount Elain, 21–23-IX-1920, G. A. Akerlind, det. Phillips (1♂ UMMZ). Distribution: Canada: AB, BC, MB (Walley 1929), NB (Roch 2020), NS (Roch 2020), ON, QC, SK (Maw et al. 2000). United States: AR, CA (Dahlsten 1967), CO, CT (Parshley 1917, 1923a; O’Donnell & Schaefer 2012), IA, ID, IL, LA, MA, ME, MI, MN (Hart 1919, Rider 2012, Koch et al. 2014), MO, MT, ND (Rider 2012), NE, NH (Parshley 1917, Roch 2020), NJ, NM (Bundy 2012), NY, OH, OK (Arnold & Drew 1988), OR, PA, SD (Harris 1937), UT, WA (Zack et al. 2012), WI (Williams 2004). Comments: Phillips (1983), in her unpublished dissertation, among other records, provided locality data that confirms the above listed records from Manitoba, Connecticut, Louisiana, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, North Dakota, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Dakota, Washington, and Wisconsin; she also listed the following states that would constitute new state records: Indiana, Kansas, Vermont, and Wyoming.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1460.030

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicRadioactive contamination and transferFrench-language works237,207