MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950268189 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8132299

Doeringiella Holmberg 1886

2016· article· en· W6950268189 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInvertebrate Taxonomy and Ecology
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScapeDorsumSexual dimorphismKey (lock)Adult male

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Key to Chilean Species of Doeringiella 1. Mesosoma with setation entirely black except on dorsum of pronotum and anterior transverse band on mesoscutum (Fig. 7); metasoma with pale apical bands primarily on T1 and T2 (Figs. 7, 9); far northern Chile (Region XV) ..................................................................... D. mamabee Packer, n. sp. —. Mesosoma with abundant pale setation (Fig. 12); metasoma with pale markings distinct on all terga (Fig. 12); central and southern Chile (from Region IV south to Region X) ..................................................................................................... 2 2(1). Male scape not swollen (Fig. 13); male S5 with complete row of approximately equally long hairs (Fig. 14); female T5 with pseudopygidial area at least as long as wide (Fig. 15) ........................................... D. gayi (Spinola) —. Male scape considerably swollen (Fig. 16); male S5 with moderately long hairs laterally, short medially (Fig. 17); female T5 with pseudopygidial area much shorter than broad (Fig. 18) .............................................. D. gigas (Spinola) Note, although females of the new species are unknown, the characters used in the key above are not generally sexually dimorphic among these bees and both sexes should be identifiable using it.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.082

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicInvertebrate Taxonomy and EcologyFrench-language works237,207