MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950277117 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7169017

Dromaeolus cylindricollis

2022· article· en· W6950277117 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsState (computer science)Identification (biology)Historical recordTable (database)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dromaeolus cylindricollis (Say, 1836) (Fig. 12) In Canada, this eucnemid species was previously known from Ontario and Québec. In the United States, D. cylindricollis has been recorded from Alabama, Arkansas, Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, and Wisconsin (Muona 2000; Otto 2012; Otto and Karns 2017). The three new state records are for and reported for Maine, Mississippi, and New Hampshire. MAINE: MAINE: Aroostook Co./ 7.1 km S Portage, 193m / 46.699579, −68.479389 / 25 Jun–10 Jul 2018 // black cross-vane panel/ trap, J. Bither/ BSF# 81314 (1, CMNH); MAINE: Aroostook Co./ 7.1 km S Portage, 193m / 46.699579, −68.479389 / 25 Jun–10 Jul 2018, LFT/ J. Bither, BSF# 81278 (1, CMNH); MAINE: Cumberland Co./ 7.5 km SSE of Raymond/ 43.83763, −70.44084 / 95m, 11–23 Jul 2019, LFT/ R. Smith, BSF# 88739 (1, CMNH). A number of images were submitted for identification on bugguide.net from both Mississippi and New Hampshire which represents records for these two states (McClarin 2007; Insinga 2021; Jones 2021).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.788
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0050.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.3000.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.138 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicSubterranean biodiversity and taxonomyFrench-language works237,207