MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950295793 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6277930

Metamasius bellorum Anderson, new species

2002· article· en· W6950295793 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsApex (geometry)TibiaTuftFront (military)Collar

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Metamasius bellorum Anderson, new species (Figs. 53­54, 63­67) Identification.—The single known specimen of this species, although closely related to M. bromeliadicola, M. nudiventris, and M. quadrilineatus, is quite distinctive based mainly on the male secondary sexual characters of the vestiture of the hind tibiae (Fig. 65) and the extensive and dense vestiture of ventrite 5 (Fig. 67). In M. bellorum the inner margin of the hind tibia has a tuft of dense elongate hairs at about the midlength, the hairs progressively shorter towards the tibial apex (Fig. 65). In M. bromeliadicola and M. nudiventris the hairs along the inner margin of the hind tibia are similarly long but arranged in an row along the tibial length, not as a distinct tuft. On the other hand, in M. quadrilineatus the hairs are long and arranged as a distinct tuft; however, there are no progressively shorter hairs extended to the tibial apex. As in M. bromeliadicola, the apex of the pygidium is subtruncate in M. bellorum (Fig. 66) and much broader than in M. quadrilineatus or M. nudiventris. Also, the front coxae in M. bellorum are widely separated by about one­half the width of a coxa whereas the front coxae in M. bromeliadicola, M. nudiventris and M. quadrilineatus are more narrowly separated by no more than about one­third the width of a coxa. In addition, the apical pilose part of the antennal club is one­third the length of the entire club (Fig. 64). Description.— Male, length, 11.7 mm; width, 4.9 mm. Female not known. Color mostly black, pronotal disc, dorsal portion of pronotal flanks, and elytra, piceous (elytra variously infuscate); elytra with elongate yellow stripe in interval 4 from near base to apical one­third, and shorter yellow stripe on interval 2 slightly beyond apical one­third. Rostrum about two­thirds length pronotum; elongate, cylindrical, evenly curved, densely, very finely, shallowly punctate; dorsally at base and laterally at point of antennal insertion with punctures slightly larger, deeper; apical one­half glabrous and virtually impunctate, shining; base of rostrum slightly expanded in dorsal view, basal expanded area short, about one­fifth total rostral length. Rostrum glabrous ventrally; peduncle flat, bilamellate anteriorly. Scrobe with posterior margin separated from anterior margin of eyes by about width of base of scape. Antennal scape about one­half length rostrum; club elongate­oval; apical pilose part one­third length of entire club. Pronotum with lateral margins subparallel to slightly sinuate in basal one­half, convergent subapically, tubulate to apex; moderately densely, deeply punctate on flanks, across apical margin and at middle of base, otherwise disc impunctate; flat at base. Pronotum with length slightly greater than width. Elytra one and one­half times length pronotum; intervals impunctate, flat; striae with distinct, moderately deep, small punctures. Scutellum broadly “V” shaped, length one and one­half times width at base, concave anteriorly, slightly emarginate. Pygidium very slightly convex, not tumescent; coarsely deeply punctate and setose throughout; apex subtruncate; apical margin with row of short setae, also with small patch of denser, erect setae medially near base. Ventrally with front coxae separated by slightly more than one­half width of coxa; prosternum moderately densely, regularly punctate, flat. Lateral portions of meso­, metasternum and ventrites 1 to 5 moderately densely, deeply punctate; punctures larger laterally on metasternum and ventrites 1 and 2; middle of metasternum and ventrites 1­4 virtually impunctate, shining; last ventrite flat, with large round patch of dense long erect hairs covering middle of apical three­quarters. Legs short, sparsely, very shallowly punctate; femora slightly clavate, short, hind femur reaching apex of ventrite 4; inner margins of all tibiae slightly sinuate subapically; hind tibiae with distinct tuft of dense elongate hairs at about the midlength, the hairs getting progressively shorter towards the tibial apex. Tarsi each with third article widely dilated, pilose ventrally except in broad “V” shaped median area; all tarsi with third articles symmetrical; apical margins of third articles moderately deeply emarginate. Sexual dimorphism.—Although females are not yet known in this species, it can be inferred (based on the related species M. bromeliadicola, M. nudiventris and M. quadrilineatus) that they will lack the pilosity on ventrite 5 and along the inner margin of the hind tibiae. Material Examined.—Male HOLOTYPE labelled “ Panama. Chiriqui Prov. / Cont’l Divide Trail / 3­4­VII.1997 / Morris & Wappes” (CMNC). Distribution.— Panama (Chiriqui). Natural history.—No information is available on natural history of this species. The habitat along the Continental Divide Trail near the La Fortuna Dam is a wet ridgetop cloud forest. Given the plant associations of its close relatives M. bromeliadicola and M. quadrilineatus, it is suspected that this species also is associated with bromeliads. Derivation of specific name.—Through their support of the Nature Discovery Fund at the Canadian Museum of Nature, this species is named after the Bell family of Grimsby, Ontario, Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.129 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207