MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950302431 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6577862

Myotis evotis

2019· article· en· W6950302431 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBat Biology and Ecology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubspeciesSubgenusMyotis lucifugusParaphylyType locality

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

378. Long-eared Myotis Myotis evotis French: Murin a oreilles longues / German: Langohriges Mausohr / Spanish: Ratonero de orejas largas Other common names: Western Long-eared Bat, Western Long-eared Myotis Taxonomy. Vespertilio evotis H. Allen, 1864, type locality not given. Restricted by G. S. Miller, Jr. in 1897 to “Monterey, Caljifornia].,” USA. Subgenus Pyzonix; lucifugus species group. Myotis evotis is most closely related to M. thysanodes, M. keenii, M. occultus, and the paraphyletic M. lucifugus (specifically M. lL carissimus and M. l. pernox, which likely represent distinct species), although relationships among these species and the clade including M. sodalis, M. volans, M. lucifugus, M. L. relictus, and M. I. alascensis are not well resolved. Six subspecies recognized. Subspecies and Distribution. M.e.evotisH.Allen,1864—coastalSWUSA(CW&SWCalifornia). M. e. chrysonotus J. A. Allen, 1896 — SW Canada (SE British Columbia, S Alberta, and S Saskatchewan) and W USA (most of Montana, W & NE North Dakota, NW South Dakota, SE Oregon, S Idaho, Wyoming, inland California, Nevada, Utah, Colorado, and extreme N New Mexico). M. e. jonesorum Manning, 1993 — SW USA (N & E Arizona and W New Mexico). M. e. micronyx Nelson & Goldman, 1909 — NW Mexico (N Baja California). M. e. milleri Elliot, 1903 — NW Mexico (S Baja California). M. e. pacificus Dalquest, 1943 — SW Canada (SW British Columbia and Vancouver I), and NW USA (Washington, most of Oregon, N Idaho, NW Montana, and NW California). Descriptive notes. Head-body 43-52 mm, tail 36-45 mm, hindfoot 810 mm, ear 18— 24 mm, forearm 37-40 mm; weight 4-9 g. Fur of the Long-eared Myotis is long and fluffy. Dorsum is yellowish to dark brown, darkest in Pacific Northwest; venteris paler. Bare face, ears, and membranes are black. Ears are very long and extend well beyond nose when laid forward. Calcar is unkeeled orslightly keeled. Skull has gradually rising forehead region; sagittal crest is usually present but inconspicuous; skull is relatively narrow overall; and braincase is ovoid when viewed from above, bulging posteriorly beyond lambdoidalcrests. Upper premolars are not crowded and in line in tooth row; molarsare relatively large; and M? has marked angle between parastyle and mesostyle. Chromosomal complement has 2n = 44 and FN = 52. Habitat. Humid coastal areas to montane forests, including mixed coniferous forests, dry forests, subalpine forests, semiarid shrublands, sage, chaparral, and agricultural areas from sea level up to elevations of ¢. 2830 m (Wyoming). Food and Feeding. [.ong-cared Myotis primarily hunt by aerial hawking but occasionally glean prey off of surfaces. They eat variousinsects but primarily Lepidoptera and Coleoptera. In Arizona, diet included Lepidoptera, Coleoptera, Diptera, Neuroptera, Hymenoptera, Hemiptera, and Homoptera. Odonata has also been recorded in diets in Montana. When sympatric with the South-western Myotis (M. auriculus), the Longeared Myotis primarily eats Coleoptera rather than Lepidoptera. Long-eared Myotis bats also appear to exhibit sexual differences in food selection, with males eating significantly more moths than females. Breeding. Pregnant Long-eared Myotis have been collected from mid-May to mid-July throughout the distribution, and volant young have been reported from late July in New Mexico. This suggests that births occur around June to mid-July. Females give birth to one young. Oldest recorded individual was a 22-year-old male. Activity patterns. L.ong-eared Myotis use various types of day roosts (e.g. abandoned buildings, tree hollows, under loose bark, among timber, caves and mines, crevices, and sinkholes). They leave roosts to forage relatively late in the evening and often continue foraging later into the night, often later than midnight. In Arizona, theyleaf roosts ¢.30 minutes after sunset and foraging for a little more than two hours, and in Oregon in August, they emerged 10-40 minutes after full darkness. They hibernate through winter. Calls are steep FM sweeps, with start frequencies of 59-9-100-2 kHz (mean 71-2 kHz), end frequencies of 31-5-48-6 kHz (37-1 kHz), peak frequencies of 45-58-4 kHz (50-8 kHz), and durations of 0-3-2-7 milliseconds (1-1 milliseconds) in Alberta. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Long-eared Myotis roost in small groups or alone, with males and some non-reproducing females living alone or in small groups in summer and reproductive females forming small maternity colonies of up to 30 individuals. They might migrate short distances from summer to winter roosts and hibernacula. They have been recorded sharing roosts with Townsend’s Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus townsendii) in Idaho. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The Longeared Myotis appears to be widespread and common throughoutits distribution and does not appear to face any major threats. Habitat loss and roost disturbance might be major risks in the future; they can be considered pests because of their preference to roost in attics. Bibliography. Arroyo-Cabrales & Alvarez-Castafieda (20179), Chruszcz & Barclay (2002b, 2003), Dalquest (1943), Faure & Barclay (1994), Faure et al. (1990), Findley (1972), Gannon & Réacz (2006), Jones, C. (1965), Jones, J.K. & Choate (1978), Jones, J.K., Lampe et al. (1973), Kellner & Harestad (2005), Larrison & Johnson 1981), Manning (1993), Manning & Jones (1989), Miller (1897), Morales & Carstens (2018), Morales et al. 2017), Nixon et al. (2009), Rancourt et al. (2005), Rust (1946), Snider et al. (2013), Solick & Barclay (2006), Vonhof & Barclay (1996, 1997), Waldien et al. (2000), Whitaker & Wilson (1974), Whitaker et al. (1977), Whitlow Hall (1933), van Zyll de Jong & Nagorsen (1994).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.208
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicBat Biology and Ecology Studies→French-language works237,207→