MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950304467 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5721288

Moschiola kathygre Groves & Meijaard 2005

2011· article· en· W6950304467 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicEvolution and Paleontology Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrown (dentistry)Rest (music)FlankWhite (mutation)Transverse planeDry zone

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

2. Yellow-striped Chevrotain Moschiola kathygre French: Chevrotain kathygre / German: Ceylon-Gelbstreifenkantschil / Spanish: Ciervo raton rayado Taxonomy. Moschiola kathygre Groves & Meijaard, 2005, eastern side of the Sri Lankan Wet Zone, some 30 km south-east of Kandy, Sri Lanka. This species is monotypic. Distribution. Wet Zone of Sri Lanka, from Sinharaja Forest Reserve through the lowlands around Colombo north to Katagamuwa on the border of the Dry Zone at 6° 24’ N, 81° 25’ E, and into the highlands at least to the Kandy District. Descriptive notes. Head-body 43-51 cm, tail 1-3 cm; weight unknown. The color of M. kathygre is much warmer, more ocherous brown than M. indica and M. meminna; spots and stripes are yellowed, not white; it has at least two tolerably complete longitudinal stripes along the flanks, with an elongated spot-row between them, and two spot-rows above them; the upperstripe curves round on the shoulder to be continuous with the anterior transverse stripes; it has two bold stripes over the haunch, and a third stripe farther back under the tail; the haunch is more densely spotted than M. meminna, and crown and nose are less darkened. On the undersideis a sharp differentiation between a white median strip and the pale ocher of the rest of underside; the lower halves of the hindlimbs are darker. The size of M. kathygre is small compared to M. indica, and hindlegs are relatively short. The following measurements are diagnostic cf. M. indica: tail length max. 2-6 cm, width across canine alveoli greater than 5 cm, least breadth across maxilla maximum 1: 42 cm, braincase breadth maximum 3-3 cm; and the following measurementis diagnostic cf. both M. indica and M. meminna: hindfoot length maximum 11-5 cm. Compared to both other species, rostrum breadth is less relative to skull length; compared to M. meminna, bullae are narrower, especially relative to interbullar distance. Dental formulais10/3,C1/1,P 3/3, M 3/3 (x2)= 34. Habitat. Forests and forested grasslands, with lakes and rivers of the Sri Lankan wet zone. It apparently also still occurs in urban scrub forest, freely enters rice paddies,is apparently more abundant in secondary forest than in primary, and occurs in rubber plantations and home gardens. All this strongly suggests significant ecological flexibility in this species. Food and Feeding. Nothing known. Breeding. Nothing known. Activity patterns. Nothing known. Movements, Home range and Social organization. Nothing known. Status and Conservation. Classified as Least Concern on The IUCN Red List. The extent of occurrence of M. kathygreis probably about 15,000 km? within which it probably has an area of occupancy (in terms of available habitat) of about 1500 km ®. On this basis the species could potentially be listed as Vulnerable. However, even though the species is frequently hunted with firearms, there is no suspicion that this is a species prone to wild fluctuations in numbers, it occurs in more than ten locations, and there is no evidence for an ongoing decline in numbers. Changes in the wet zone forest cover cannot be used to infer a decline because of the species’ wide habitat adaptability. Bibliography. Duckworth & Timmins (2008), Groves & Meijaard (2005).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.051
Threshold uncertainty score0.169

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicEvolution and Paleontology StudiesFrench-language works237,207