MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950307526 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6485724

Filellum serpens

2012· article· en· W6950307526 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSerpensGenusType speciesNomenclatureType (biology)Specific nameKey (lock)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Filellum serpens (Hassall, 1848) Fig. 26 Campanularia serpens Hassall, 1848: 2223 [the specific name serpens Hassall, 1848 conserved and placed on Official List of Specific Names in Zoology, Opinion 1485 (ICZN 1988)]. Filellum serpens.— Segerstedt, 1889: 15, 25.— Lönnberg, 1898: 53.— Jäderholm, 1909: 76, pl. 7, fig. 11.— Kramp, 1935b: 125.— Jägerskiöld, 1971: 62.— Cornelius, 1975b: 379; 1995a: 255, figs. 58A–C. Type locality. Ireland: Dublin (Cornelius 1975b: 379). Museum material. Kosterhavet, 58°53.039’N, 11°05.602’E, 160 m, 09.ix.2010, biological dredge, R / V Nereus, three colonies, two on Tubularia indivisa stems and one on Abietiniaria abietina, without gonophores, ROMIZ B3905. Remarks. The genus Filellum Hincks, 1868 and species assigned to it, including F. serpens (Hassall, 1848), were reviewed and revised by Peña Cantero et al. (1998) and Marques et al. (2011). Threats to nomenclatural stability of both generic and specific names of F. serpens by lesser known senior synonyms were removed under a ruling (Opinion 1485) by the ICZN (1988). Ten species were recognized as valid in Filellum worldwide by Marques et al. (2011). Trophosomes in these hydroids are stolonal and simple, comprising sessile and tubular hydrothecae, and identification of species can be difficult or impossible in the absence of gonophores. Gonothecae are aggregated to form a coppinia, the form of which can be diagnostic. Filellum serpens, type species of the genus by monotypy, is common in southwestern Scandinavia (Kramp 1935b; Jägerskiöld 1971; Christiansen 1972). It is a boreal, eurybathic species, often found growing on other hydroids and especially on sertulariids (Cornelius 1995a; Peña Cantero et al. 1998; Marques et al. 2011). Christiansen (1972: 297) also observed it on “...algae, stones, shells, dead Lophelia, calcareous polychaete tubes and tests of the foraminifer Rhabdammina.” Reported distribution. West coast of Sweden.—From near the border with Norway (Jägerskiöld 1971) to the Öresund (Lönnberg 1898; Kramp 1935b). Elsewhere.—North Atlantic from Spitzbergen and northern seas of the Russian Federation (Calder 1970) to the Mediterranean Sea (Peña Cantero et al. 1998) in the east, and from northern Foxe Basin in the Canadian Arctic to Buzzard’s Bay, Massachusetts (Calder 2004) in the west. Although reports suggest that the species is virtually cosmopolitan, many records are suspect in the absence of coppinia (Marques et al. 2011). It is likely restricted largely to boreal regions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.125

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0030.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.010

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicAquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior→French-language works237,207→