Bibliographic record
Abstract
Nallachius dicolor Adams, 1970 Herein we add seven individuals to the known fauna of the species that, to date, was known only from the type series, from Nova Teutônia, state of Santa Catarina in southern Brazil (Adams 1970). Three of these were collected in Caldas Novas, state of Goiás (central western Brazil) and four were collected in Berizal, Minas Gerais (Brazil, transition from southeast to northeast), expanding considerably the range of the species. Material examined. BRAZIL: Goiás: 3 males, Caldas Novas, P.E. Serra de Caldas Novas, 700–1000m, 17°46’13’’S – 48°39’22’’W, 22–23.iii.2008, light trap, J. A. Rafael, F. F. Xavier F°; 4 males, Minas Gerais: Berizal, Fazenda Veredão, 700–1000m, 15°39’54’’S – 41°39’56’’W, 14.xii.2007, J. A. Rafael, P.C. Grossi & D.R. Parizotto col,. light trap, 850m.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.170 | 0.033 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".