MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950317386 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.7257363

Andrena (Chlorandrena) danini Pisanty & Scheuchl 2016

2022· article· en· W6950317386 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2022
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTendon Structure and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScutellumWhite (mutation)Vertex (graph theory)Process (computing)Spider

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Andrena (Chlorandrena) danini Pisanty & Scheuchl, 2016 (Figs. 58–62, 64–65) Male (Fig. 58). Body length: 7–7.5 mm. Colour. Head, mesosoma and legs black (Fig. 58). Apical 1/4–1/3 of clypeus usually yellow, at least centrally; paraocular area black (Fig. 59). Anterior side of flagellomeres 2–11 brown. Wings hyaline, veins and stigma brown. Metasoma dark brown to black; tergal marginal zones yellowish-brown, sometimes reddish (Fig. 61). Pubescence. Head and mesosoma with medium to long white hair, especially dense and long on genal area, mesepisternum and fore coxa (Figs. 58–60). Femora and tibiae with white hair, tarsi with white to golden hair (Fig. 58). Tergal discs with moderately dense white hair, relatively long on tergum 1, gradually shorter on following terga, longer on lateral parts of terga. Tergal marginal zones with similar hair, denser on lateral parts, not forming distinct hair bands (Fig. 61). Head (Figs. 59–60). 1.2 times broader than long. Labral process broader than long, trapezoidal, smooth and shiny, apical margin distinctly emarginate. Clypeus convex, very weakly protuberant, shagreened on basolateral margin, elsewhere smooth and shiny, punctation strong and dense, distance between punctures 1 puncture diameter, without impunctate midline (Fig. 59). Flagellomere 1 twice as long as 2, slightly longer than 3. Frons strongly longitudinally striated, interspersed with fine punctures. Ocelloccipital distance 1.2 ocellus diameters. Vertex strongly carinate, posterodorsal margin of genal area slightly carinate (Fig. 60). Mesosoma (Fig. 60). Dorsolateral angle of pronotum not elevated, pronotum not carinate. Mesonotum and scutellum shiny, distinctly shagreened peripherally, weakly shagreened to smooth centrally, strongly punctured, distance between punctures 0.5–1.5 puncture diameters (Fig. 60). Mesepisternum and anterolateral part of propodeum strongly and densely obliquely punctured. Posterolateral part of propodeum finely alveolate, finely and irregularly rugose. Propodeal triangle delineated by weak carina, very finely rugose basally, very finely rugose to alveolate apically. Nervulus interstitial to antefurcal. Metasoma (Fig. 61). Tergal discs shiny, 1 shagreened to smooth, 2–4 shagreened basally, weakly shagreened to smooth apically, disc 1 with strong, coarse crater-like punctures, the following discs gradually more shallowly punctured, distance between punctures 1–2 puncture diameters. Tergal marginal zones broad, moderately depressed, impunctate, finely shagreened except near apex, 2–4 occupying 0.4–0.5 of tergum length centrally. Genitalia and hidden sterna (Figs. 62, 64–65). Dorsal gonocoxite lobes adjoined along medial genital axis, strongly developed, rounded apically. Gonostyli very elongate, blades flattened, leaf-shaped, apex weakly to strongly pointed. Basal 1/3 of penis valves of moderate, uniform width, central 1/3 tapering apically, apical 1/3 narrow (Fig. 62). Sternum 8 columnar, without lateral extensions, slightly broadened medially, apical half densely, uniformly hairy on ventral side, elsewhere mostly hairless, apical process slightly broadened, blunt-ended (Figs. 64–65). Diagnosis. The males of A. danini very closely resemble those of A. cinereophila Warncke, and Warncke regarded them as a subspecies of the latter, named Andrena cinereophila antelica nomen nudum. The true identity of these specimens was only made possible with the advent of DNA barcoding (Table 2). Andrena danini males are distinguished from A. cinereophila by the smaller yellow apical area on the clypeus (covering half of clypeus in A. cinereophila), the more or less evenly, finely rugose propodeal triangle (basal margin more or less radially rugose, more strongly sculpted than apical part in A. cinereophila), the centrally smooth tergal discs 2–3, with distinct crater-like punctures (smooth to shagreened, crater-like punctures absent or weakly present only laterally in A. cinereophila), the more elongate genital capsule, and the straight, adjoined, apically rounded dorsal gonocoxite lobes (diverging outwards, more pointed apically in A. cinereophila) (Figs. 62–63). Distribution: Israel (Pisanty et al. 2016); newly recorded from Jordan, Syria, Turkey and the West Bank, in arid to semi-arid habitats. In Israel, A. danini is present in the central region and the northern Negev, as well as the Jordan Valley, but it is apparently absent from the more mesic-habitat regions of the Carmel, Galilee, northern Golan and Mount Hermon. Flight period: February–April, occasionally into May in Turkey (one handwritten record apparently from July, possibly erroneous). Flower records: Asteraceae: Calendula sp., Crepis sancta, Geropogon hybridus, Leontodon tuberosus; Brassicaceae: Sinapis sp.; Geraniaceae: Geranium sp.; Linaceae: Linum pubescens. Material examined: HOLOTYPE: ISRAEL: Lakhish, 3 km NE, 31.578°N 34.870°E, 19.ii.2016, G. Pisanty (♀) (SMNHTAU:234232); PARATYPES: ISRAEL: Besor Stream [Bsor W.], 4.iii.1985, E. Shney-Dor (1♀); Canada Park, 31.836°N 35.000°E, 18.iii.2016, G. Pisanty (1♀); Hartuv [Har.Tuv], 22.ii.1955, student (1♀); Jerusalem, 2.? vii.1940, H. Bytinski-Salz (1♀); Lakhish, 6.iii.2013, T. Shapira, pan traps (2♀); 20.iii.2013, T. Shapira, pan traps (2♀); 8.iv.2013, T. Shapira, pan trap (1♀); 13.iv.2013, T. Shapira, pan traps (2♀); 3 km NE, 31.575°N 34.870°E, 4.iii.2016, G. Pisanty, partly from pan traps (3♀); 11.iii.2016, G. Pisanty (1♀); 19.iii.2016, G. Pisanty, pan traps (2♀); 31.578°N 34.870°E, 19.ii.2016, G. Pisanty (1♀); Netiv HaLamed-Heh [Netiv Halamed He], 2 km WNW, 31.694°N 34.96°E, 26.ii.2009, G. Pisanty (1♀) (ES, OLML, SMNHTAU); non-type material: ISRAEL: Beit Guvrin [Beit Govrin], 28.iii.2010, G. Pisanty (6♀); Beit Nir, 28.iii.2010, G. Pisanty (1♀); 11.iii.2018, T. Roth, on Crepis sancta (1♀) and Linum pubescens (1♀); Degania [Deganya], 23.ii.1942, Y. Palmoni (1♂) (A. c. antelica paratype label); Gal’on, 4.iv.2018, T. Roth, on Geropogon hybridus (1♀); Gilat Research Center, fallow field, 31.3372ºN 34.6633ºE, 2.iii.2022, G. Pisanty, pan traps (2♂); Har’el, 21.ii.2020, K. Levy, pan trap (1♂); Horbat Sheqofa, 252 m, 31.5775°N 34.871°E, 15.iii.2021, G. Pisanty, pan traps (3♀, 7♂); Jerusalem, Mt. Scopus, 22.ii.1946 (1♂) (A. c. antelica paratype label); 15.iii.1946, on Calendula, Geranium and Sinapis (6♂) (A. c. antelica holotype / paratype labels); Jerusalem env., 28.iii.1988, R. Leys (1♂); Kfar Menahem [Kefar Menahem], 6.ii.2010, G. Pisanty, on Leontodon tuberosus (1♂); Lakhish, 21.ii.2013, T. Shapira, pan trap (1♂); 3 km NE, 31.578°N 34.870°E, 19.ii.2016, G. Pisanty (2♂); [Lachish], 18.ii.2020, K. Levy, pan trap (1♀) and T. Roth, on Crepis sancta (1♂); 4.iii.2020, K. Levy, pan trap (1♂); 8.iii.2020, K. Levy, pan trap (1♂); 8.iii.2020, T. Roth, on Crepis sancta (1♂); Ma’agar Yeroham [Yerucham Lake], 15.iv.1997, A. Maklakov (1♀); Mikveh Israel [Miqwe Israel], 10.iii.1919, H. Bytinski-Salz (1♂) (A. c. antelica paratype label); Nahal Arugot [N.Arugot], 2.iii.1981, S. Kronenberg (1♀); Nahal Poleg [Birquat Ramadan], 13.iii.1940, H. Bytinski-Salz (1♂) (A. c. antelica paratype label); Negba, 31.iii.2021, Y. Halevi (1♀, 1♂); Netiv HaLamed-Heh [Netiv Halamed He], 2 km WNW, 31.694°N 34.96°E, 26.ii.2009, G. Pisanty, pan trap (1♂); Tell es-Safi [Tel Zafit], 7.iii.2018, T. Roth, pan traps (2♀); JORDAN: Irbid, Saham, 25.iv.2003, I. Pljushtch (1♀); SYRIA: Jabbul-See, SE Aleppo, 300 m, 19.iv.1992, K. Warncke (1♀); Maaloula [Maalula], 15.iv.1992, M. Kraus (1♀); TURKEY: Urfa, Ceylanpınar, 25.iv.1976, K. Warncke (1♂); Urfa, 20 km SE Harran, 23.v.1983, K. Warncke (1♀); WEST BANK: Har Brakha [Berakha], 1 km S, ‘Amassa Spring, 595 m, 6.iii.2015, L. Friedman (1♂); Maskiot [Maskiyyot], Rt. 578, Wadi Halat Mahmud el-‘Ali, – 75 m, 32°19’18’’N 35°29’52’’E, 27.ii.2020, L. Friedman (1♀); Wadi Ahmar, nr. Yarden, 32°01’N 35°30’E, 15.iii.2005, I. Zonstein (1♂); Wadi al-Far’a [Wadi Faria], 19.ii.1974, A. Freidberg (1♂) (A. c. antelica paratype label); Wadi Qelt [Nahal Perat], south-facing slope, 28.ii.2007, L. Friedman (1♂) (OLML, RMNH, SMNHTAU, TJW).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.564
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0380.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.253
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2022
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicTendon Structure and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207