MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W6950318964 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.6149444

Silphinae

2013· article· en· W6950318964 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPeck (Imperial)LarvaAlienHead (geology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Subfamily Silphinae Necrodes surinamensis (Fabricius, 1775) Figs. 5, 19, 32, 45 Silpha surinamensis Fabricius, 1775: 72. Diagnosis. Body length 20–25 mm, broadly subparallel, dark brownish to black, elytra with small subapical reddish maculae. Head with large eyes, without short row of long erect hairs behind each eye. Pronotum orbicular, widest towards middle; disc without pubescence. Elytra with apices conjointly subtrunctate to projected medially; disc tricostate, intervals smooth and finely granulose; epipleuron oblique, wider at base than apex, coloration not differing from remainder of body. Hind femur of male swollen, with one or two spines. Range. Newfoundland south to Florida, west to British Columbia, Oregon and Texas (Anderson & Peck 1985, Peck & Kaulbars 1987); possibly in northern Mexico (Peck & Anderson 1985). The stated type locality, “ America meridionali ”, and the species-group name suggests that this species occurs in South America, but this was discounted by Peck and Anderson (1985) who suggest that it ranges no further south than possibly the extreme northern areas of Mexico along the Texas border. Texas distribution. See Fig. 45. This species is widespread in the Austroriparian and Texan biotic provinces of eastern Texas, with scattered records from the Tamaulipan, Balconian, Kansan, and Chihuahuan provinces. It occurs in the following Texas vegetational areas: pineywoods, gulf prairies and marshes, post oak savannah, blackland prairies, cross timbers and prairies, south Texas plains, Edwards Plateau, rolling plains, high plains, and trans-Pecos. Confirmed counties (52): Anderson, Angelina, Bastrop, Baylor, Bell, Brazoria, Brazos, Brewster, Cameron, Camp, Chambers, Cherokee, Clay, Comanche, Dallas, Delta, Donley, Erath, Fannin, Fayette, Galveston, Gonzales, Grayson, Gregg, Hardin, Hemphill, Hill, Hunt, Jasper, Jefferson, Kaufman, Kerr, Lamar, Leon, Lubbock, McLennan, Montgomery, Nacogdoches, Palo Pinto, Red River, Robertson, San Jacinto, Smith, Sutton, Swisher, Tarrant, Tyler, Uvalde, Victoria, Walker, Wood. Collections: BRC, EGRC, JAC, LASM, MWSU, SFAC, SHSU, TAMU, TORC, TTU, UTIC, WTAM. Seasonality in Texas. See Fig. 32. Adults of this species have been collected in Texas in almost every month of the year. The adult seasonality profile of this species (based on 204 occurrence records: Appendix I) is unimodal, with a large peak in spring. Biological notes. Anderson and Peck (1985) report that adults are nocturnal and found mostly on large carcasses. In Nebraska this species has shown a strong preference for marshy and forested areas (Ratcliffe 1996). According to Lingafelter (1995), this species prefers mostly open and sandy areas in Kansas. Data from examined labels. Collecting methods: UV and MV light trap, pit fall trap, incandescent light, flightintercept trap. Habitat records: under bark. Carrion records; tiger [dead zoo specimen], bull, shrimp, cat, chicken and cow. Most Texas collections were made at lights, verifying the statement by Anderson and Peck (1985) that adults are nocturnal. Ratcliffe (1972), Anderson (1982), Schubeck (1983), and Watson and Carlton (2005) provide details on the natural history of this species.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.037
Threshold uncertainty score0.000

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.174 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)→Same topicOceanographic and Atmospheric Processes→French-language works237,207→