Dryas integrifolia subsp. integrifolia Vahl subsp. integrifolia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dryas integrifolia Vahl subsp. integrifolia Figure 15A–C Materials examined. CANADA – Nunavut • Ellesmere Island, CFS Alert; 82°28′34″N, 062°26′49″W; 128 m a.s.l.; 2 Jul. 2019; habitat: barren ground, with till and rocks as substrates, and sparse dominance of Saxifraga oppositifolia; QFA0635001. Identification. Plants 3–8 cm high; dwarf shrubs. Taproots and rhizomes present. Branches prostrate, sometimes rooting at nodes. Leaves evergreen; basal and cauline; isomorphic; alternate; petiolate. Stipules green or brown; hairy. Petioles 2–5 mm long; hairy, with white hairs. Leaf blades 4–9 mm long, 1–3 mm wide; lanceolate; bases cordate or truncate; unlobed; abaxial surface tomentose, with white hairs; adaxial surface shiny dark green, glabrous or sparsely hairy on the midvein; margins entire or slightly crenate, revolute, and glabrous; apices acute. Inflorescence a solitary flower. Pedicels 15– 25 mm long; erect; hairy with woolly hyaline hairs and dark purple glandular hairs. Epicalyx absent. Sepals 7 or 8; 3–7 mm long, 1–2 mm wide; linear or lanceolate; dark green; surface hairy, with woolly hyaline hairs and dark purple glandular hairs; margins ciliate; apices acute. Petals 8; 7–11 mm long, 3–5 mm wide; obtrullate or obovate; unlobed; white or ivory. Androecium with 40–70 stamens and 0.5–0.9 mm long anthers. Gynoecium consisting of numerous separate carpels, with 5–6 mm long conical styles. Fruit an achene, with elongate plumose styles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.017 | 0.006 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".