MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950338482 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.8290026

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) ameshoferi Landaverde-González & Gardner & Moo-Valle & Quezada-Euán & Ayala & Husemann 2023, sp. nov.

2023· article· en· W6950338482 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicFern and Epiphyte Biology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDorsumMargin (machine learning)Oblique caseOvoidPosterior wall

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lasioglossum (Dialictus) ameshoferi Landaverde-González sp. nov. urn:lsid:zoobank.org: act: 56635D12-86E3-4758-B5A1-BFE003DBAF00 Figs 5G–H, 6D, 13–14, 25A, 26A, 34C Diagnosis Females of L. (D.) ameshoferi sp. nov. can be recognised by the combination of tegula small and ovoid with inner posterior angle not produced mesally (tegula width/ITS 0.21–0.22), clearly not reaching posterior margin of mesoscutum in dorsal view, and impunctate except for scattered minute punctures in anterior half; frons punctures as large and dense as those of lower paraocular area; mesoscutum with large, coarse and dense punctures (i <1 pd), crowded laterad of parapsidal lines (i = 0 pd) except on anteromedian margin (i> 1.5 pd); mesepisternum strongly rugose with the upper part areolate; metapostnotum shiny with strong subparallel rugae usually reaching posterior margin; and propodeum with strong U-shaped oblique carina sharply delineating metapostnotum. Males have the tegula small and ovoid (as in the female); frons punctures as large and dense as those of lower paraocular area, which is clearly visible beneath sparse appressed tomentum; metapostnotum with strong subparallel rugae reaching or nearly reaching posterior margin; and propodeum with trace of oblique carina present (this is unusual for males which almost always lack an oblique carina even when it is well-developed in the female). Differential diagnosis Both sexes of Lasioglossum (Dialictus) ameshoferi sp. nov. are most similar to L. (D.) nanotegula sp. nov. and females of L. (D.) milpa sp. nov. (the male is unknown). Females of L. ameshoferi are also similar to an undescribed species known from higher elevations in the mountains of Chiapas. Both sexes of L. (D.) nanotegula have the frons punctures much smaller and denser than those of the lower paraocular area, which in the male is partially obscured by dense appressed tomentum; females also have the propodeum with an oblique carina straight; and males have the propodeum without a trace of an oblique carina. Females of L. milpa also have the metapostnotum dull, imbricate, with shallow anastomosing rugae reaching posterior margin or nearly so and mesepisternum slightly sparsely punctate (i ≤ 1–1.5d), while females of L. nanotegula have the mesoscutum punctures laterad of the parapsidal lines moderately dense but not crowded (i ≤ 1 pd). Females of the undescribed Chiapas species have the frons punctures much smaller and denser than those of the lower paraocular area. Lasioglossum ameshoferi sp. nov. is very similar to the Panama species L. strigosigena Michener, 1954, and diagnostic characters separating the two are not well known. It seems that the postgena of L. ameshoferi is mostly smooth, while in L. strigosigena it is entirely and strongly lineate, but a few specimens of L. ameshoferi approach the condition found in L. strigosigena. Geography is probably the most reliable way to separate these species. Etymology The specific epithet is dedicated to Andreas Ameshofer for his great support to PLG and his love and patience during the development of the entire study. Type material Holotype MEXICO – Campeche • ♀; Hopelchén; 19.66° N, 89.66° W; elev. 77 m; 24 Jan. 2016; Misael Hdz leg.; ECOAB.82784. Paratypes GUATEMALA – Huehuetenango • 1 ♀; Jacaltenango, San Andrés; 15.7167° N, 91.7455° W; elev. 1027 m; 28 Feb. 2010; Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.44665 • 1 ♀; La Democracia, Unión; 15.574° N, 91.8141° W; elev. 1038 m; 26 Feb. 2010; Jorge Mérida leg.; ECOAB.44666 • 1 ♀; San Antonio Huista, Pinalito; 15.6653° N, 91.8618° W; elev. 963 m; 1 May 2010; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.44660. MEXICO – Campeche • 1 ♀; Hopelchén; 19.71° N, 89.8° W; elev. 70 m; 2 Oct. 2015; Roberto May leg.; ECOAB.82345 • 1 ♀; Hopelchén; 19.39° N, 89.71° W; elev. 147 m; 4 Nov. 2015; Misael Hdz leg.; ECOAB.82585 • 1 ♀; Hopelchén; 20.04° N, 89.74° W; elev. 105 m; 22 Jan. 2016; Eric Vides leg.; ECOAB.82685.– Chiapas • 1 ♀; 37 km E of Tuxtla Gutiérrez; 16.75° N, 92.9167°W;elev.1240 m; 12Apr. 1993; George C. Eickwort leg.; ex Senecio deppeanus; SEMC SM0341238 • 1 ♀; Arriaga, Ej. Adolfo López Mateos; 16.3463° N, 93.9741° W; elev. 367.5 m; 15 Sep. 2009; Carlos Balboa, Miguel Guzmán and Miguel Cigarroa leg.; ECOAB.54267 • 1 ♀; Nicolás Ruiz and Carr. N. Ruiz-V. Guerrero; 16.4238° N, 92.6326° W; elev. 685 m; 29 Oct. 2011; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.53509 • 2 ♀♀; Ocozocoautla; 16.84° N, 93.45° W; elev. 836 m; 30 Dec. 2015; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.79338, 79346 • 1 ♀; Suchiapa; 16.6294° N, 93.0916° W; elev. 465 m; 8 Sep. 1987; L. Mendoza leg.; ECOAB.43998 • 1 ♀; Venustiano Carr.; 16.49° N, 92.5° W; elev. 1073 m; 31 Dec. 2016; Philippe Sagot leg.; ECOAB.67208. – Colima • 1 ♀; San Antonio; 19.4515° N, 103.7184° W; elev. 1200 m; 10 Oct. 2008; Laurence Packer leg.; PCYU. – Guerrero • 2 ♀♀; 23 mi W of Acapulco; [17° N, 100.2° W]; 10 Aug. 1962; Ellen Ordway leg.; SEMC. – Jalisco • 1 ♀; Chamela; [19.5° N, 105.04° W]; 6 Jul. 1985; Ricardo Ayala Barajas leg.; ex Prockia crucis; SEMC • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 17 Aug. 1985; SEMC. – Oaxaca • 1 ♀; Puerto Escondido; [15.87° N, 97.08° W]; elev. 10 m; 1 Sep. 1990; Luis M. Gódinez leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; same collection data as for preceding; 30 Sep. 1990; SEMC. – Quintana Roo • 2 ♀♀; Tulum; [20.21° N, 87.47° W]; 22 Jan. 1976; L. Greenberg leg.; SEMC • 1 ♂; same collection data as for preceding; SEMC. – Yucatán • 1 ♂; Yucatán, Tixcuytun; [20°12′21.80″ N, 89°09′17.50″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 293; UNAM (photographed) • 3 ♀♀; 30 mi S of Mérida; [20.53° N, 89.61° W]; 31 Jul. 1964; Paul J. Spangler leg.; USNM • 2 ♂♂; Chichén-Itzá; [20.68° N, 88.57° W]; 11 Jan. 1976; L. Greenberg leg.; SEMC • 1 ♂; Kabah, 25 km SW of Ticul; [20.25° N, 89.65° W]; 14 Feb. 1987; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Mérida; [20.97° N, 89.59° W]; Nov. 1961; N.L.H. Krauss leg.; SEMC • 2 ♀♀; Uxmal Ruins, 16 km SW of Muna; [20.36° N, 89.77° W]; 14 Feb. 1987; Charles D. Michener leg.; SEMC • 1 ♀; Yaxnic; [20.79° N, 89.62° W]; 8 Apr. 1997; R.W. Brooks, H. Delphin, H. Contreras and U. Mao leg.; ex Acacia pennatula; SEMC SM0106223. Other material examined MEXICO - Yucatán • 1 ♀; Alfonso Caso; [20° 05′02.5″ N, 89°09′39.3″ W]; 25 Oct. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 113; ZMH 842030 • 1 ♀; Tah Dziú; [20°10′06.9″ N, 88°55′36.2″ W]; 7 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 241a1; ZMH 842033 • 1 ♂; Tixcacaltuyub; [20°25′03.1″ N, 88°55′51.5″ W]; 22 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 502a; ZMH 839502 • 1 ♀; Tixcuytun; [20°11′25.30″ N, 89°10′29.30″ W]; 22 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 493d; ZMH 63081 • 1 ♀; Alfonso Caso; [20°05′02.5″ N, 89°09′39.3″ W]; 25 Oct. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 89; ZMH 842065 • 1 ♀; Tixmehuac; [20°15′52.4″ N, 89°08′58.1″ W]; 22 Jun. 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 411; ZMH 842067 • 1 ♀; Yucatán, Nenela; [20°14.44′0.0″ N, 89°05′24.5″ W]; 9 May 2011; Quezada-Euán and Moo-Valle leg.; original label 2; UADY. Floral records ASTERACEAE Giseke: Senecio L.: S. deppeanus Hemsl. • FABACEAE Juss.: Acacia Mill.: A. pennatula (Schltdl. & Cham.) Benth. • SALICACEAE Mirb.: Prockia P. Browne ex L.: P. crucis P. Browne ex L. • SOLANACEAE Adans.: Capsicum L.: C. chinense Jacq. DNA barcodes Fourteen sequences are available (BOLD process IDs: BBLEG181-17, DIAL1304-08, GMMCK090-14, GMMCK130-14, GMMCK932-14, LDSPS110-15 to LDSPS118-15). These sequences are attributed to L. ameshoferi sp. nov. based on two specimens (BBLEG181-17, DIAL1304-08) that were examined and barcoded independently of the sequences from Yucatán; the specimen corresponding to BBLEG181-17 is the holotype. Including the Yucatán sequences, there is a large amount of divergence (maximum intraspecific p-distance 4.21%; minimum interspecific p-distance (to L. aureoviride sp. nov.) 5.92%). Within the Yucatán sequence there is also variation (maximun intraspecific p-distance 1.44%; minimum interspecific p-distance (to L. aureoviride) 5.53%). Description Female (holotype) MEASUREMENTS. Length 5.47 mm; head length 1.48 mm; head width 1.6 mm; fore wing length 3.7 mm. 15 female paratypes measured: length 5.01–5.47 mm; head length 1.17–1.48 mm; head width 1.22– 1.6 mm; fore wing length 3.22–3.7 mm. COLOUR. Head and mesosoma metallic dark blue-green; clypeus apical half black; scape black, F1–F10 black dorsally, dark brown ventrally; tegula reddish brown; wing membrane subhyaline, subcosta black, venation and pterostigma otherwise brown; legs dark brown; metasoma black with apical margins of terga and sterna dark brown. PUBESCENCE. Whitish; head and mesosoma with abundant long pubescence (1–2.5 OD); gena with sparse appressed tomentum; propodeum with abundant plumose setae on lateral and posterior surfaces (1.5–2.5 OD); T1 with dense complete setose fan; T2–T3 with small basolateral patches of appressed tomentum covering less than half length of segment; T1–T2 evenly and densely covered by short simple setae, T3–T4 with similar setae but about twice as long; tarsal segments with plumose light-yellow setae. SURFACE SCULPTURE. Face with strong uniform large and dense punctation; clypeus shiny and densely punctate (i≤ 1 pd); supraclypeal area tessellate and sparsely punctate (i = 1–4 pd); upper paraocular area, frons, and ocellocular area shiny, with crowded punctures (i = 0 pd); lower paraocular area shiny and very densely punctate (i <0.5 pd); antennocular area imbricate and slightly less densely punctate (i ≤ 1 pd); gena and postgena finely lineate, becoming smooth and shiny on postgena anteriorly; mesoscutum tessellate, and large, coarsely and densely punctate (i <1 pd), becoming crowded laterad of parapsidal line (i = 0 pd) and slightly sparse on anteromedian margin (i> 1.5 pd); tegula impunctate except a few scattered minute punctures on anterior half; mesoscutellum coarsely and moderately sparsely punctate (i = 1–2 pd

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.165
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0240.036

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.040
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2023
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicFern and Epiphyte BiologyFrench-language works237,207