MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W6950343719 · doi:10.5281/zenodo.5968375

Meganema claviformis , Fraser 1939

2018· article· en· W6950343719 on OpenAlexaboutno aff

Bibliographic record

VenueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapeBarnacleOn boardEuropean union

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Meganema claviformis Fraser, 1939b Lafoeina maxima Levinsen, 1893: 182, pl. 6, figs. 9–12. Keratosum complexum Hargitt, 1909: 379, figs. 8–10. Levinsenia maxima.— Hadži, 1917: 55. Eupoma maximum.— Stechow, 1920: 45. Meganema claviformis Fraser, 1939b: 60, figs. 2a–c. Lafoeina claviformis.— Fraser, 1947a: 240. Keratosum maximum.— Calder, 1991: 10. Syntypes. BCPM 976-00302-001: Canada, Nunavut, Dolphin and Union Strait, off Cape Bexley, 68°59’N, 115°40’W, 16 m, summer 1936 or 1937, RCMP Vessel St. Roch, dredge, two colony fragments, coll. Sgt. H.A. Larsen; slide. Lectotype, by present designation. RBCM 976-00302-001: Canada, Nunavut, Dolphin and Union Strait, off Cape Bexley, 68°59’N, 115°40’W, 16 m, summer 1936 or 1937, RCMP Vessel St. Roch, dredge, one colony fragment (specimen on the left side of the slide BCPM 976-00302-001), 8 mm high, in only fair condition, without gonophores, coll. Sgt. H.A. Larsen; slide. Paralectotype. BCPM 976-00302-001: Canada, Nunavut, Dolphin and Union Strait, off Cape Bexley, 68°59’N, 115°40’W, 16 m, summer 1936 or 1937, RCMP Vessel St. Roch, dredge, one colony fragment, 8 mm high, in only fair condition, without gonophores, coll. Sgt. H.A. Larsen; slide. Type locality. Canada, Nunavut: Dolphin and Union Strait, off Cape Bexley, 68°59’N, 115°40’W, 16 m (Fraser 1939b). Current status. Invalid. Remarks. In describing Meganema claviformis, Fraser (1939b) reported that the hydroid was “attached to sponges, barnacle shells, etc.” No name-bearing type was designated by him. The only type material of the species in existence is mounted on a slide (BCPM 976-00302-001) in the Fraser Hydroid Collection at the RBCM. Two specimens occur on the slide, both of them fragmentary. While the fragments may be part of a single colony, we have not assumed so for nomenclatural purposes (ICZN Recommendation 73F). The specimen on the left side of the slide has been designated here as the lectotype (RBCM 976-00302-002) to objectively define the species and ensure stability of nomenclature. The specimen on the right is the paralectotype. Fraser (1947a) abandoned Meganema Fraser, 1939b as valid, acknowledging that M. claviformis was referable to the same genus as Lafoeina maxima Levinsen, 1893. He nevertheless persisted in recognizing Lafoeina claviformis as a distinct species. The two were later regarded as synonyms (Calder 1970, 1991). The species is listed in Cairns et al. (2002) as Keratosum maximum and in WoRMS as Lafoeina maxima. The former is maintained here for reasons given above in Remarks on the genus Meganema.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.045

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0140.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)Same topicMarine Invertebrate Physiology and EcologyFrench-language works237,207